2010
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/12/023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarizing bubble collisions

Abstract: We predict the polarization of cosmic microwave background (CMB) photons that results from a cosmic bubble collision. The polarization is purely E-mode, symmetric around the axis pointing towards the collision bubble, and has several salient features in its radial dependence that can help distinguish it from a more conventional explanation for unusually cold or hot features in the CMB sky. The anomalous "cold spot" detected by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite is a candidate for a featu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several non-standard physical mechanisms have been proposed as possible explanations. These include the gravitational effect produced by a collapsing cosmic texture (Cruz et al 2007), the linear and nonlinear ISW effect caused by a void in the large-scale structure (e.g., Tomita 2005;Inoue & Silk 2006;Rudnick et al 2007;Tomita & Inoue 2008;Finelli et al 2016), a cosmic bubble collision within the eternal inflation framework (Czech et al 2010;Feeney et al 2011;McEwen et al 2012), and a localized version of the inhomogeneous reheating scenario within the inflationary paradigm (Bueno Sanchez 2014).…”
Section: Commandermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, several non-standard physical mechanisms have been proposed as possible explanations. These include the gravitational effect produced by a collapsing cosmic texture (Cruz et al 2007), the linear and nonlinear ISW effect caused by a void in the large-scale structure (e.g., Tomita 2005;Inoue & Silk 2006;Rudnick et al 2007;Tomita & Inoue 2008;Finelli et al 2016), a cosmic bubble collision within the eternal inflation framework (Czech et al 2010;Feeney et al 2011;McEwen et al 2012), and a localized version of the inhomogeneous reheating scenario within the inflationary paradigm (Bueno Sanchez 2014).…”
Section: Commandermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, no polarization signal would be expected in those models producing secondary anisotropies due to a gravitational effect, whereas a specific pattern might be expected in a bubble collision scenario (Czech et al 2010). Appropriate tests will be pursued in future work, once the large-scale polarization data are available.…”
Section: Commandermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering CMB observations first, the increased angular resolution of upcoming experiments such as Planck will improve constraints on the step model, but not on the ramp model where the signal is weighted toward large scales that are already sample variance limited in WMAP. Future measurements of CMB polarization may eventually improve constraints on both models [13]. Looking beyond the CMB, large-scale structure can potentially provide interesting constraints on bubble collisions, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our observable Hubble volume is a smaller region given by taking the intersection with the past lightcone of a present-day observer. If there is a second bubble nucleation, and its future lightcone intersects our observable Hubble volume, then the metric will be perturbed, and this will generate a disc-shaped CMB temperature perturbation [10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Mini-summary Of the Theory Of Bubble Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative proposals include cosmic texture [37,38], chaotic post-inflationary preheating [39], cosmic bubble collisions (e.g., [40]), and nothing less than a gate to extra dimensions [41].…”
Section: Cold Spot and Proposed Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%