2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2011.03.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarization squeezing in polarized light

Abstract: It is shown that polarized light can be polarization squeezed only if it exhibits sub-Poissonian statistics with the Mandel's Q factor less than -1/2.In classical optics, Stokes parameters are used to denote the polarization state [1,2]. For light beam travelling along the 3-direction, the Stokes parameters S 0,1,2,3 are defined by and lead to the uncertainty relations,

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But, it is very important to notice that the squeezed vacuum is observed squeezed in polarization [14] when the first criterion for polarization squeezing [5] is used, however, the two mode squeezed vacuum shows no squeezing in polarization on using the general criterion that considers uncertainty relation followed by Stokes operators in addition to the commutation relations. We observe that it does not exhibit any squeezing in polarization as per the general criteria [7,8] for a general component of Stokes operator vector. In a similar way, we obtain the minimum squeezing factor in case of Stokes operator Ŝ3 for (φ x + φ y ) = π/2 and (φ y − φ x ) = 0 with a condition tanh kt = 2r x r y /r 2 x + r 2 y , as…”
Section: The Two Mode Squeezed Vacuum and Polarization Squeezingmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But, it is very important to notice that the squeezed vacuum is observed squeezed in polarization [14] when the first criterion for polarization squeezing [5] is used, however, the two mode squeezed vacuum shows no squeezing in polarization on using the general criterion that considers uncertainty relation followed by Stokes operators in addition to the commutation relations. We observe that it does not exhibit any squeezing in polarization as per the general criteria [7,8] for a general component of Stokes operator vector. In a similar way, we obtain the minimum squeezing factor in case of Stokes operator Ŝ3 for (φ x + φ y ) = π/2 and (φ y − φ x ) = 0 with a condition tanh kt = 2r x r y /r 2 x + r 2 y , as…”
Section: The Two Mode Squeezed Vacuum and Polarization Squeezingmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Later, this definition was modified by Heersink et al [6] taking into account the uncertainty relations followed by these Stokes operators and generalized by Luis and Korolkova [7] for a general component of Stokes operator vector. The authors have written the criterion for polarization squeezing for a general component of Stokes vector operatorŜ n along the unit vector n [8][9][10] in the following form…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is referred to as planar squeezing [123,124]. Alternative results concerning the simultaneous squeezing of two or three [133] Stokes operators have been obtained. Finally, we mention that uncertainty relations can be assessed using measures of uncertainty other than variance; the most popular alternatives are entropic measures [134].…”
Section: Uncertainty Relations and Polarization Squeezingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where |vac is vacuum state satisfyingâ ε |vac = 0. On considering the normal ordering of the operators [12], expectation values of Stokes operators (3) and their squares and anticommutators can be obtained by straight calculations which on simplification (usingâ ε ⊥ |ψ = 0) give Ŝ 0 = N, Ŝ 1 = N cos θ, Ŝ 2 = N sinθ cos φ, Ŝ 3 = N sin θsinφ,…”
Section: Polarization Squeezing Of Photon Number Statementioning
confidence: 99%