2008
DOI: 10.1049/el:20083122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarisation control schemes for fibre-optics quantum communications using polarisation encoding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our proposal consists of a real-time continuous solution where the reference signals are separated in wavelength from the quantum signal, in order to achieve this goal. As was discussed in [19], there are three possible approaches: a) one control channel, containing both SOPs S 1 and S 3 , each with a different amplitude modulation frequency, easily split at the receiver through filtering (dithering); b) two separate control channels (one for each SOP) operating in continuous-wave mode (CW); and c) combining the solution from a) and b), that is, two separate control channels, each containing both states S 1 and S 3 through amplitude modulation, so that the mean value is taken. Method c) yields the best control performance, although it is more complex to implement.…”
Section: Control In Practicementioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our proposal consists of a real-time continuous solution where the reference signals are separated in wavelength from the quantum signal, in order to achieve this goal. As was discussed in [19], there are three possible approaches: a) one control channel, containing both SOPs S 1 and S 3 , each with a different amplitude modulation frequency, easily split at the receiver through filtering (dithering); b) two separate control channels (one for each SOP) operating in continuous-wave mode (CW); and c) combining the solution from a) and b), that is, two separate control channels, each containing both states S 1 and S 3 through amplitude modulation, so that the mean value is taken. Method c) yields the best control performance, although it is more complex to implement.…”
Section: Control In Practicementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Good results were achieved even with a channel separation of 0.8 nm and a fibre mean group delay of 0.54 ps [18]. Simulations have shown that good control with the same channel separation on fibres with <τ> up to 1 ps are achievable [19], meaning that a good correlation exists between the SOP of the reference signals and of the quantum channel. Most QKD fibre spans (~100 km) have <τ> smaller than 1 ps.…”
Section: Control Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We employ two side channels, one at a shorter, and the other at a longer wavelength than the quantum channel. They are also placed as close as possible to the quantum channel according to our simulations [10].…”
Section: The Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our quantum channel was chosen to be placed at λ Q = 1546.12 nm. According to our simulations, a distance of 0.8 nm from the classical channels to the quantum channel will suffice for typical QKD transmission distances [10]. Therefore we used the immediate below and above channels in the grid, λ 1 = 1545.32 nm and λ 3 = 1546.92 nm respectively.…”
Section: The Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%