Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarimetric SAR pixel offset tracking for large-gradient landslide displacement mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, window sizes of 51 × 51 and 61 × 61 produced overly smoothed results, resulting in the loss of fine details despite having smaller MAE values. This finding is consistent with previous studies [45]. Considering a trade-off between accuracy and preserving fine details, we selected a window size of 41 × 41.…”
Section: Ground Deformation Mapping Using Potsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand, window sizes of 51 × 51 and 61 × 61 produced overly smoothed results, resulting in the loss of fine details despite having smaller MAE values. This finding is consistent with previous studies [45]. Considering a trade-off between accuracy and preserving fine details, we selected a window size of 41 × 41.…”
Section: Ground Deformation Mapping Using Potsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The main steps include SAR image stitching, image registration and resampling, differential interferometry, and filtering. Due to the unique TOPS imaging mode of the Sentinel-1 data, it was necessary to stitch the burst data and then register it [26] . Based on the project area, bursts 158-159 from the iw3 swath of Sentinel-1 data were selected for stitching.…”
Section: Insar Preprocessing Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability of the phase shift on the scale of the sliding window provides an estimation of the measurement’s consistency [ 32 ]. Although large correlation windows enhance measurement accuracy, they compromise resolution and blur small-scale motion details [ 14 ]. Therefore, achieving a balance between different window sizes is crucial for accurately evaluating pixel similarity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this problem exists in most methods based on the pixel offset tracking principle. For example, Jiehua Cai et al pointed out the dependence of offset estimation on correlation window size in the SAR POT technique [ 14 ]. However, there is limited research on this problem in optical data processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%