1994
DOI: 10.1093/icb/34.1.90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polar Marine Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
130
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
130
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous attempts to explain Antarctic marine community structure are based mainly on present-day patterns in the recolonization of habitats, following physical destruction by ice scouring at a relatively minor scale [4][5][6]. However, we suggest that these patterns cannot be applied to conditions during Cenozoic glaciations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous attempts to explain Antarctic marine community structure are based mainly on present-day patterns in the recolonization of habitats, following physical destruction by ice scouring at a relatively minor scale [4][5][6]. However, we suggest that these patterns cannot be applied to conditions during Cenozoic glaciations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In particular, these processes are likely to have been crucial for the survival of sessile filter feeders, such as sponges, which are characteristic of present-day Antarctic benthic communities [2][3][4]36]. High sedimentation rates can have structuring effects on benthic communities, especially on filter feeders [53]; for example, they should particularly select against filter and suspension feeders, such as gorgonians and sponges, which have evolved feeding mechanisms that exploit the supply of only the smallest particles [54].…”
Section: Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…components of Arctic communities (Dayton et al, 1994;Gutt, 2001), while echinoderms (e.g. Odontaster and Sterechinus) are hugely important in the Antarctic (Dayton et al, 1969(Dayton et al, , 1994. The relative ease with which the sub-polar species here initiated ice formation, compared to Antarctic species reported in (Denny et al, 2011), suggests one potential barrier to polar spread: even mild anchor ice events would likely remove all of the sub-polar species we tested.…”
Section: /8mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Maxima indicated by * for stripes and ** for grid; normalized freeze time does depend on surface parameters (ANOVA, P = 0.0004 for spacing, P = 0.0389 for height), but increases in freeze time are small relative to the noise in the measurement. components of Arctic communities (Dayton et al, 1994;Gutt, 2001), while echinoderms (e.g. Odontaster and Sterechinus) are hugely important in the Antarctic (Dayton et al, 1969(Dayton et al, , 1994.…”
Section: /8mentioning
confidence: 99%