Soft-output (SO) decoding is proposed for the Logarithmic Successive Cancellation List (Log-SCL) polar decoder for the first time, by exploiting the left-to-right propagation of the Belief Propagation (BP) decoder, which opens new avenues for its employment in powerful turbo-receivers. In the case of decoding a half-rate polar code having a block length of 1024 bits, the proposed soft list polar decoder achieves a 1.5 dB Block Error Ratio (BLER) performance gain, 50% latency improvement and 26% complexity reduction, compared to the state-of-the-art SO Soft Cancellation (SCAN) polar decoder in a polar-coded Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) system. Furthermore, we conceive a Memory-Efficient (ME) soft list polar decoder, which requires only 16% of the soft list polar decoder's memory, at the cost of slightly increased latency and complexity. I. INTRODUCTION Polar codes [1] have been selected for protecting the 5G New Radio (NR) control channels, as a benefit of their superior Block Error Ratio (BLER) performance at short block lengths [2]. Therefore, both Hard-Output (HO) and Soft-Output (SO) polar decoders have been investigated in the literature [1, 3-8]. The soft-input HO (SIHO) polar decoders typically rely on the original Successive Cancellation (SC) decoder proposed in [1] or sphere decoder of [9], whereas SISO may be produced by the Belief Propagation (BP) algorithm [3, 10]. The SC decoder is capable of approaching the Binary-Input Discrete Memoryless Channel (B-DMC) capacity for infinite block lengths [1] where the channel is sufficiently polarized, but exhibits poor BLER performance for realistic finite block lengths due to the associated error propagation. Considering a list of candidate bit sequences and operating on the basis of Logarithmic Likelihood Ratios (LLRs), the Logarithmic Successive Cancellation List (Log-SCL) polar decoder, developed from the SCL decoder of [11], improves the error-correction performance of the SC decoder in the case of practical block lengths [4]. The software and hardware implementations of the Log-SCL decoder have been investigated in [12-15], which have a low memory requirement and a low decoding latency. However, the Log-SCL decoder is not a SISO scheme, and hence fails to exploit the iterative LLR updates gleaned from the detector of a turbo-receiver [5, 16].