2017 IEEE 18th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/spawc.2017.8227653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polar coded probabilistic amplitude shaping for short packets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For SR-CCDM, the unranking algorithms have a serialism of min(w, n − w), and ranking with colex does not require any iterations (see Algorithm 2), which we define as a serialism of 1. 7 In contrast, the AC-CCDM mapping and demapping algorithms are in the worst case serial in the length of their respective inputs, which is k for mapping and n for demapping. This DoS is summarized in Table IV.…”
Section: B Degree Of Serialism (Dos) Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For SR-CCDM, the unranking algorithms have a serialism of min(w, n − w), and ranking with colex does not require any iterations (see Algorithm 2), which we define as a serialism of 1. 7 In contrast, the AC-CCDM mapping and demapping algorithms are in the worst case serial in the length of their respective inputs, which is k for mapping and n for demapping. This DoS is summarized in Table IV.…”
Section: B Degree Of Serialism (Dos) Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mapping with SR has a serialism of min(w, n − w) = 36, and demapping always has serialism 1 for colex ordering. Thus, the total reduction in 7 The serial combination of the component subsequences is neglected here. serialism from the subset-ranking method is 190/37 ≈ 5.14.…”
Section: B Degree Of Serialism (Dos) Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many-to-one demappers more bits per symbol needs to be demapped which slightly increases the complexity of the demapper [41]. Compared to the other probabilistic schemes for polar codes such as in [25], [26], the IPPC scheme does not require an additional shaping encoder or shaping decoder. Moreover, with the IPPC scheme very fine granularity in rate step can be achieved by changing the number of parity bits in polar code, which can be realized without any additional hardware complexity and latency at the receiver.…”
Section: Systematic Polarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-level polar codes combined with PAS and DM have been studied in [25] for short packets. This combination increases the latency and complexity at the transmitter and receiver due to the use of DM and multi-level decoding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is further extended to 5G NR polar codes in Reference 27. In Reference 28, the probabilistic amplitude shaping from Reference 24 is combined with polar codes, where a precoder is used for systematic encoding and a distribution matcher is used to shape the amplitudes of the ASK symbols. The receiver uses a multistage decoder (as in MLC) and a distribution dematcher to recover the message.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%