2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2019.108391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pointwise gradient estimates for a class of singular quasilinear equations with measure data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the previous results and being motivated by some intensive studies from Calderón-Zygmund estimates and global regularity results under the certain range of p, our interest here is to further establish these pointwise estimates for gradient of solutions to quasilinear elliptic equations in terms of Wolff type potentials of the source term µ, under 'very singular' case for which 1 < p ≤ n−2 2n−1 . Our main approach based on the technique presented by Nguyen and Phuc in [38] and our pointwise gradient potential estimates obtained in this paper extend such kind of results under assumptions (A1), (A2), (A3), (A4). Moreover, in order to obtain the global pointwise bounds for the gradient of solutions to problem (1) (the second main result in this paper), it is important for us to impose an additional assumption on the boundary of domain Ω.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following the previous results and being motivated by some intensive studies from Calderón-Zygmund estimates and global regularity results under the certain range of p, our interest here is to further establish these pointwise estimates for gradient of solutions to quasilinear elliptic equations in terms of Wolff type potentials of the source term µ, under 'very singular' case for which 1 < p ≤ n−2 2n−1 . Our main approach based on the technique presented by Nguyen and Phuc in [38] and our pointwise gradient potential estimates obtained in this paper extend such kind of results under assumptions (A1), (A2), (A3), (A4). Moreover, in order to obtain the global pointwise bounds for the gradient of solutions to problem (1) (the second main result in this paper), it is important for us to impose an additional assumption on the boundary of domain Ω.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…Let us firstly recall the following technical lemma, Lemma 2.1, a result related to the comparison estimate between solutions to both problems (1) and the homogeneous one. This result was proved by Q.-H. Nguyen in his earlier unpublished work [36] and an initial version of the result has been proved in [37] when µ ∈ L 1 (Ω) and 3n−2 2n−1 < p ≤ 2 − 1 n , see also [47, Appendix A] for a detail proof. It is worth noting that the proof of this comparison result in [47] is still valid for the non-degenerate case τ > 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…be such that dist (supp (µ), ∂Ω) > 0. If for some C > 0 depending on p, N , q j and Λ j (j=1,2), Ω and dist (supp (µ), ∂Ω) there holds 16) then problem (1.4) admits a renormalized solution u satisfying 17) if p > 2, and…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 3.7[10,14,17] Let Ω be a bounded domain of R N . Then there exists a constantC = C(N, p, Λ 1 , Λ 2 , diam(Ω)) > 0 such that if µ ∈ C b (Ω) and u is a solution of problem (3.1) there holds |∇u(x)| ≤ C (I r 1 [|µ|](x))for any B r (x) ⊆ Ω and for some γ 0 ∈ (0, N (p−1) N −1 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%