2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2021.101789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Points of Interest recommendations: Methods, evaluation, and future directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing POI datasets. POIs are an important component of tourist visits and their recommendation has received strong attention from the research community [10,52]. A recent review discusses POI recommendation based on multimedia content [10], underlining the central role of visual content in recording tourist visits.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing POI datasets. POIs are an important component of tourist visits and their recommendation has received strong attention from the research community [10,52]. A recent review discusses POI recommendation based on multimedia content [10], underlining the central role of visual content in recording tourist visits.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such personalization can be achieved by leveraging user profiles that encode their tourist prefer-Figure 1: Proposed use-case of Vis2Rec . ences [10,52]. Mainstream recommendation methods relied on a form of matrix factorization to propose personalized content [21,14,44], while more recent methods use deep learning algorithms to improve the performances of recommender systems [9,43], and their effectiveness is largely determined by the quality and richness of the available profiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to CAPRI, Werneck et al [24] introduces an additional framework for 2 https://caprirecsys.github.io/CAPRI/ the reproducibility of POI experiment recommendations. However, their approach is not exhaustive and is not easily replicable, as it only generates the outcomes of their earlier work [23].…”
Section: Related Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the density of POI check-ins data is typically approximately 0.1%, whereas the density of Netflix data for movie suggestions is 1.2%. This is because a person can only visit a limited number of locations, whereas a city can contain a vast number of POIs; ‚ Necessity for multi-dimensional evaluation: Previous papers [8,18,23] in the POI field predominantly focus on accuracy-oriented metrics. However, there is a remarkable consensus in the RS community that there are other important facets to the recommendation process that accuracy metric systems cannot simply capture, such as the novelty, diversity, and catalog coverage of recommenders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weights are aggregated and the features of the entity are merged. There are two main meanings of adopting this method [5,6]: first, the calculation of the feature vector of the entity contained in the knowledge graph is weighted and aggregated with the information of the neighboring entity within a certain range of the entity, second, the information of the neighbor node is calculated for the node. The degree of selection is jointly influenced by the established entity and neighboring entities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%