1997
DOI: 10.1051/agro:19970403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Points de repère dans l'analyse de la stabilité et de l'interaction génotype-milieu en amélioration des plantes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the fact that the environmental index is not independent of the performances 473 of the studied genotypes can introduce a bias in the estimate of the regression parameters 474 (Crossa 1990). Moreover, the percentage of G×E variance explained is often very low, below 475 25% (for a review, see Brancourt-Hulmel et al 1997). In our case, the number of environments 476 considered, two, was probably too few for a precise estimate of the regression slope for each 477 genotype.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the fact that the environmental index is not independent of the performances 473 of the studied genotypes can introduce a bias in the estimate of the regression parameters 474 (Crossa 1990). Moreover, the percentage of G×E variance explained is often very low, below 475 25% (for a review, see Brancourt-Hulmel et al 1997). In our case, the number of environments 476 considered, two, was probably too few for a precise estimate of the regression slope for each 477 genotype.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiparametric models, AMMI (Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction) (Gauch and Zobel, 1988), SREG (Crossa and Cornelius, 1997), and factorial regression (Denis, 1988) are suitable for interpreting the response of genotypes to different environments. Among models proposed in studying GE interaction (Crossa, 1990; Brancourt‐Hulmel et al, 1997), the SREG model (Crossa and Cornelius, 1997) has been chosen for the present study because it simultaneously considers G and GE interaction effects for visualization of cultivar performance across different environments, allowing interpretations in terms of mean performance and stability of genotypes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An AMMI, joint regression or factorial regression model was considered adequate if: (i) genotype variation for its parameters was significant at P < 0.01 (as more liberal P levels implied, for experiments not repeated in time, a greater danger to model GL effects with limited repeatability in time); and (ii) its residual GL interaction, tested on the pooled experimental error, was below P < 0.01 significance. The best unidimensional model was selected on the basis of the mean square of its GL interaction parameter, because this value accounts for the two determinants of model predictive ability, namely accuracy (as high sum of squares) and parsimony (as low degrees of freedom) (Brancourt-Hulmel et al 1997). Factorial regression-modelled responses of cultivars to one environmental variable were graphically expressed as nominal values of yield or final row cover, to linearize them and improve thereby their display.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%