2012
DOI: 10.4064/aa152-2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Points de hauteur bornée sur les variétés de drapeaux en caractéristique finie

Abstract: Points de hauteur bornée sur les variétés de drapeaux en caractéristique finie par Emmanuel Peyre (Grenoble)Introduction. La compréhension du comportement asymptotique des points rationnels de hauteur bornée sur les variétés presque de Fano audessus d'un corps de nombres a fortement progressé ces dernières années notamment grâce à l'impulsion donnée par Manin (cf. [BM], [FMT], [P1], [Sal] et [BT2]). Il serait naturel que le formalisme développé dans ce cadre s'étende dans une certaine mesure au cas des corps g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Manin's problem on function fields has been studied very scarcely until now: one must nevertheless quote the works of Bourqui [Bou02,Bou03,Bou11], which completely solve the case of toric varieties (employing harmonic analysis but also the universal torsor method), as well as the papers [LY] and [Pey12] which treat independently the case of generalised flag varieties, Peyre's work containing moreover an interpretation of the constant. Peyre's method is analogous to Franke, Manin and Tschinkel's for flag varieties over number fields in [FMT], the role of the results of Langlands being played by those of Morris about Eisenstein series over function fields.…”
Section: Manin's Problem Over Function Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manin's problem on function fields has been studied very scarcely until now: one must nevertheless quote the works of Bourqui [Bou02,Bou03,Bou11], which completely solve the case of toric varieties (employing harmonic analysis but also the universal torsor method), as well as the papers [LY] and [Pey12] which treat independently the case of generalised flag varieties, Peyre's work containing moreover an interpretation of the constant. Peyre's method is analogous to Franke, Manin and Tschinkel's for flag varieties over number fields in [FMT], the role of the results of Langlands being played by those of Morris about Eisenstein series over function fields.…”
Section: Manin's Problem Over Function Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sous les seules hypothèses que nous avons données, la convergence du produit eulérien dans (2.0.1) n'est a priori pas assurée. Nous renvoyons à [Pey03] pour des précisions sur les hypothèses permettant de montrer la convergence en utilisant Weil-Deligne. Pour la classe de variétés étudiée dans cet article, ces hypothèses sont vérifiées et la convergence du produit peut d'ailleurs se voir de manière élémentaire.…”
Section: Conjectures De Manin Géométriquesunclassified
“…(2.0.1) L'interprétation conceptuelle de γ(X) se fait en termes du volume de l'espace adélique associé à la variété X × k k(C ) pour une certaine mesure de Tamagawa, cf. [Pey95,Pey03]. Sous les seules hypothèses que nous avons données, la convergence du produit eulérien dans (2.0.1) n'est a priori pas assurée.…”
Section: Conjectures De Manin Géométriquesunclassified
“…Now remark that, disregarding convergence issues, the expression (2.6.20) makes sense for any variety X satisfying hypotheses 1.1, not only the toric ones. Under suitable extra hypotheses on X, Peyre showed that the Euler product in (2.6.20) is indeed convergent and predicted that (2.6.20) should coincide with the constant c appearing in question 1.8 (in fact Peyre's construction applies to a far more general context, including the case of nonconstant families; (2.6.20) is interpreted as the volume of an adelic space associated to X, with respect to a certain Tamagawa measure; see [Pey03a] for more details). Thus we will have checked that Peyre's prediction holds when X is toric.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%