2015
DOI: 10.12775/ths-2014-010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pointing in the right direction. A discussion of The evolution of social communication in primates, eds. M. Pina and N. Gontier

Abstract: Abstract. The Evolution of Social Communication in Primates, edited by Marco Pina and Natalie Gontier is an important contribution to the current debates on language evolution. The volume includes texts discussing the emergence of basic social skills connected with language, arguments for vocal and gestural protolanguage, and theories of development of symbolic and compositional language in the history of humanity. In this review, I present the structure and content of the book, but also highlight issues that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples from 2014 include Dunbar et al (ed 2014), Scott-Phillips (2014), as well as The evolution of social communication in primates (ed. Pina and Gontier 2014), which is reviewed in the present volume (Dębska 2014). However, The social origins of language, edited by Daniel Dor, Chris Knight and Jerome Lewis, holds a special place in this mix, aspiring -rightly, in my view -to the role of an important programmatic statement.…”
Section: T H E O R I a E T H I S To R I A S C I E N T I A R U M V Omentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Examples from 2014 include Dunbar et al (ed 2014), Scott-Phillips (2014), as well as The evolution of social communication in primates (ed. Pina and Gontier 2014), which is reviewed in the present volume (Dębska 2014). However, The social origins of language, edited by Daniel Dor, Chris Knight and Jerome Lewis, holds a special place in this mix, aspiring -rightly, in my view -to the role of an important programmatic statement.…”
Section: T H E O R I a E T H I S To R I A S C I E N T I A R U M V Omentioning
confidence: 96%