2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20174939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pointer Defect Detection Based on Transfer Learning and Improved Cascade-RCNN

Abstract: To meet the practical needs of detecting various defects on the pointer surface and solve the difficulty of detecting some defects on the pointer surface, this paper proposes a transfer learning and improved Cascade-RCNN deep neural network (TICNET) algorithm for detecting pointer defects. Firstly, the convolutional layers of ResNet-50 are reconstructed by deformable convolution, which enhances the learning of pointer surface defects by feature extraction network. Furthermore, the problems of missing detection… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average precision (AP) is used as the evaluation index of each defect detection in this experiment after the model training is completed, and the mean average precision (mAP) is used as the evaluation index of the whole model performance. The definitions of precision (P), AP, and mAP [ 37 ] are shown as follows: where TP is the number of samples with correct detection, FP is the number of negative samples with detection, and r is the value of recall ( R ). The definition of recall rate is shown in formula ( 10 ), ρ interp( r ) can be expressed as formula ( 11 ) [ 37 ], j is the category index, n j is the total number of categories, and AP j is the average precision of each category: where FN is the number of samples with error detection and is the recall rate of .…”
Section: Steel Defect Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average precision (AP) is used as the evaluation index of each defect detection in this experiment after the model training is completed, and the mean average precision (mAP) is used as the evaluation index of the whole model performance. The definitions of precision (P), AP, and mAP [ 37 ] are shown as follows: where TP is the number of samples with correct detection, FP is the number of negative samples with detection, and r is the value of recall ( R ). The definition of recall rate is shown in formula ( 10 ), ρ interp( r ) can be expressed as formula ( 11 ) [ 37 ], j is the category index, n j is the total number of categories, and AP j is the average precision of each category: where FN is the number of samples with error detection and is the recall rate of .…”
Section: Steel Defect Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e average precision (AP) is used as the evaluation index of each defect detection in this experiment after the model training is completed, and the mean average precision (mAP) is used as the evaluation index of the whole model performance. e definitions of precision (P), AP, and mAP [37] are shown as follows:…”
Section: Experimental Environment and Parameter Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep Learning Small Defects Hu [16] 1928 × 1448 3.41 × ○ Zhao [18] 2800 × 300 1.57 ○ ○ Tabernik [14] 1408 × 512 0.11 ○ × Westphal [15] 180 × 180 0.13 ○ × Jiang [19] 512 × 512 2.29 ○ ○…”
Section: Methods Input Image Speed [S]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed an algorithm that can detect positive regions, where steel shells are present and applied Gaussian filtering and binarization to the interior of the ellipse to detect the existence of pits. To detect five types of defects that occur in the process of manufacturing, Zhao et al proposed the TICNET model, which improves the existing cascade R-CNN approach [18]. The feature extraction capacity of the model was improved by applying deformable convolution layers instead of convolution layers; this can learn both weights and kernel offsets [19,20].…”
Section: Limitations Of Existing Object Detection Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, machine vision has been popularly used in the defect detection of industrial products instead of labor. However, most studies are focused on the detection of products’ external surface [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ], while few are reported on the internal defects of injection-molded parts with DR imaging. Early work in internal defect detection with DR images using machine vision was based on traditional image processing for automated supervision and localization of defects, which mainly relies on manually produced feature extractors, such as area feature extraction, edge detection, threshold segmentation [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%