1999
DOI: 10.1007/s005210050009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point-Wise Confidence Interval Estimation by Neural Networks: A Comparative Study based on Automotive Engine Calibration

Abstract: In developing neural network techniques for real world applications it is still very rare to see estimates of con dence placed on the neural network predictions. This is a major de ciency, especially in safety-critical systems. In this paper we explore three distinct methods of producing point-wise con dence intervals using neural networks. We compare and contrast Bayesian, Gaussian Process and Predictive error bars evaluated on real data. The problem domain is concerned with the calibration of a real automoti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the residual errors are randomly distributed, there is a general rule of thumb which states that they will lie within two standard deviations of their mean with a probability of 0.95. This method was used in the measurements of the ANN prediction performance conducted by some researchers (Bishop, 1995;Tibshirani, 1996;Shao et al, 1997;Zhang et al, 1998;Lowe and Zapart, 1999;Townsend and Tarassenko, 1999) ANN models and statistical analyses were carried out using MATLAB 7.0 and XLSTAT2008 (Excel2003 add-in) for Windows. …”
Section: Determination Of Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the residual errors are randomly distributed, there is a general rule of thumb which states that they will lie within two standard deviations of their mean with a probability of 0.95. This method was used in the measurements of the ANN prediction performance conducted by some researchers (Bishop, 1995;Tibshirani, 1996;Shao et al, 1997;Zhang et al, 1998;Lowe and Zapart, 1999;Townsend and Tarassenko, 1999) ANN models and statistical analyses were carried out using MATLAB 7.0 and XLSTAT2008 (Excel2003 add-in) for Windows. …”
Section: Determination Of Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this variance is used as a target value for another neural network, then the optimum output of this second network is again the conditional mean of that variance. As reported in Lowe and Zapart [5], in the implementation of predictive error bars two correlated neural neural networks are used. Each network shares the same input and hidden nodes, but has different final layer links which are estimated to give the approximated conditional mean of the target data in the first network, and the approximated conditional mean of the variance in the second network.…”
Section: Gaussian Distribution Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods for estimating the uncertainty around the predicted output of a neural network have been presented [4]- [6]. In this work, the predictive error bar method will be used [5]. This approach is based on the important result that for a network trained on minimum square error, the optimum network output approximates the conditional mean of the target data, or f À1 opt ðsðtÞÞ ¼< uðt À dÞjsðtÞ >, and that the local variance of the target data can be estimated as kuðt À dÞ À f À1 opt ðsðtÞÞk 2 .…”
Section: Gaussian Distribution Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are several examples of the application of ANNs to problems of fault diagnosis, there are fewer examples of their application to fault diagnosis in internal combustion engines (although for exceptions, see elsewhere [1,[10][11][12]). More common applications have been to gear boxes, and bearing faults (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%