2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point spread function modelling for wide-field small-aperture telescopes with a denoising autoencoder

Abstract: The point spread function reflects the state of an optical telescope and it is important for data post-processing methods design. For wide field small aperture telescopes, the point spread function is hard to model, because it is affected by many different effects and has strong temporal and spatial variations. In this paper, we propose to use the denoising autoencoder, a type of deep neural network, to model the point spread function of wide field small aperture telescopes. The denoising autoencoder is a pure… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows to shift the usual data-driven modeling space from the pixels to the wavefront and translate much of the modeling complexity into the forward model. The use of DL methods for the modeling of instrumental response fields is limited due to the complexity of the modeling problem and the fact that current efforts are blind to the physics of the problem [5]. The present work lays the groundwork for the introduction of physically-motivated and interpretable DL methods into the modeling of instrumental response fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows to shift the usual data-driven modeling space from the pixels to the wavefront and translate much of the modeling complexity into the forward model. The use of DL methods for the modeling of instrumental response fields is limited due to the complexity of the modeling problem and the fact that current efforts are blind to the physics of the problem [5]. The present work lays the groundwork for the introduction of physically-motivated and interpretable DL methods into the modeling of instrumental response fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has motivated the development of a wide range of methodologies for PSF modeling. These include models based on Moffat functions [6], polynomial models [7][8][9][10], principal component analysis [11][12][13], sparse matrix factorization [14][15][16], specific basis functions [17,18], optimal transport [19], neural networks [20][21][22][23], and a parametric model of the telescope's optics [24][25][26].…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the PNET, when observation condition changes, we propose to extract images of reference stars to obtain PSFs and background noise (Jia et al 2020c). Then we use simulation methods discussed in Section 3 to generate simulated images and train the PNET with these images.…”
Section: Keeping Performance Of the Pnet For Images With Variable Psfsmentioning
confidence: 99%