2011
DOI: 10.1364/oe.19.023298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point-spread function engineering to reduce the impact of spherical aberration on 3D computational fluorescence microscopy imaging

Abstract: Wavefront encoding (WFE) with different cubic phase mask designs was investigated in engineering 3D point-spread functions (PSF) to reduce their sensitivity to depth-induced spherical aberration (SA) which affects computational complexity in 3D microscopy imaging. The sensitivity of WFE-PSFs to defocus and to SA was evaluated as a function of phase mask parameters using mean-square-error metrics to facilitate the selection of mask designs for extended-depth-of-field (EDOF) microscopy and for computational opti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantify the difference between two images ( , , ) a x y z and ( , , ) b x y z we used a 3D normalized mean square error (NMSE) which is calculated according to the following equation [25] …”
Section: D Normalized Mean Square Error (Nmse 3d )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the difference between two images ( , , ) a x y z and ( , , ) b x y z we used a 3D normalized mean square error (NMSE) which is calculated according to the following equation [25] …”
Section: D Normalized Mean Square Error (Nmse 3d )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(c)] and are also higher in intensity, indicating that it experiences less SA. To quantify the deviation of the different theoretical PSFs from the experimental PSF, a normalized mean square error (NMSE) metric 35 was computed using the experimental PSF as a reference. The calculated NMSE values are 0.13 for the N-interface PSF and 0.41, 0.57, and 0.23 for the PSFs predicted by the existing model assuming specimen RI ¼ 1.46, RI ¼ 1.56, and RI ¼ 1.51, respectively.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Theoretical N-interface Psf Model Using Exmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). In the five cases presented here, the specimen is comprised of To quantify the deviation of the different theoretical PSFs from a reference PSF, an NMSE metric 35 was computed. PSF comparison and discussion of the variability of the PSF with the RI change within the specimen is summarized in the next section.…”
Section: N-interface Psfs Computed For Different Sample Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid imaging systems, in which a phase mask is placed in the pupil plane to make the modulation transfer function (MTF) or the point spread function (PSF) less sensitive to defocus, can be used in many applications, such as aberrations reduction [1,2], thermal imaging [3,4], iris recognition [5,6]. In a hybrid imaging system, the incident wavefront is intentionally coded with a phase mask and the optically blurred images will be deblurred and decoded by a digital processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%