2020
DOI: 10.1097/pec.0000000000001939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Assess Gastric Content

Abstract: Gastric ultrasound (US) is a growing modality within the point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) field. It provides the ability to directly measure an individual patient's gastric content and has potential use as both a clinical and a research tool. Here, we review the historical development of current gastric US models and their clinical application within the field of general anesthesia, describe the US findings and technique for using POCUS to assess gastric content, and discuss the current and potential applicati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the availability of sonographers determined whether gastric ultrasound was performed or not, the sample included a significant proportion of children operated on outside normal working hours. Second, the threshold of gastric fluid volume above which aspiration risk becomes significant remains a matter of debate [11, 34]. The risk of aspiration is generally considered high when gastric fluid volume is >1.5 ml.kg −1 [35] and low when it is < 0.8 ml.kg −1 [9], but there is a ‘grey zone’ between these two values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the availability of sonographers determined whether gastric ultrasound was performed or not, the sample included a significant proportion of children operated on outside normal working hours. Second, the threshold of gastric fluid volume above which aspiration risk becomes significant remains a matter of debate [11, 34]. The risk of aspiration is generally considered high when gastric fluid volume is >1.5 ml.kg −1 [35] and low when it is < 0.8 ml.kg −1 [9], but there is a ‘grey zone’ between these two values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) following the technique described by Perlas [31][32][33][34][35] and previously reviewed by our group. 42 All patients were imaged with the curvilinear probe to establish a wide view of abdominal anatomy, with addition of the high-frequency linear probe to allow for increased resolution of gastric anatomy and content when patient habitus was amenable. A minimum of one live clip and 3 still images were obtained in each position.…”
Section: Study Protocol and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have debated this cutoff and used anywhere between 0.8 and 1.5 mL/kg. [33][34][35]37,38,42,44,46,56,71,72 We chose our cutoff of 1.25 ml/kg based on data by Cook-Sather 71 in which 95% of 611 fasting pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery demonstrated a volume less than 1.25 mL/kg. Implications of various quality and quantity of solid content have also not been quantified.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations