2014
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point‐of‐care blood glucose measurement errors overestimate hypoglycaemia rates in critically ill patients

Abstract: Documentation of point-of-care blood glucose measurement errors likely overestimates ICU hypoglycaemia rates and can be reduced by a quality improvement effort. The currently used hypoglycaemic patient-day metric does not evaluate recurrent or prolonged events that may be more likely to cause patient harm. The monitored patient-day as currently defined may not be the optimal denominator to determine inpatient hypoglycaemic risk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our initial work in this area identified likely POC BG measurement/operator errors that followed a consistent pattern, an extreme (high or low) POC BG value that was followed within 5 minutes by a POC BG that was normal or continued the previous POC BG trend for that patient without any documentation of intervention. 6 This project confirms the frequency of these POC BG measurement/operator errors. Initial POC BG values <40 mg/dL, 40-69 mg/dL, or >400 mg/dL were commonly deleted and repeated ( Table 2).…”
Section: Evaluating Deleted Poc Bg Values Likely To Be Measurement/opsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our initial work in this area identified likely POC BG measurement/operator errors that followed a consistent pattern, an extreme (high or low) POC BG value that was followed within 5 minutes by a POC BG that was normal or continued the previous POC BG trend for that patient without any documentation of intervention. 6 This project confirms the frequency of these POC BG measurement/operator errors. Initial POC BG values <40 mg/dL, 40-69 mg/dL, or >400 mg/dL were commonly deleted and repeated ( Table 2).…”
Section: Evaluating Deleted Poc Bg Values Likely To Be Measurement/opsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…While our previously published QI project provided evidence for the hypothesis that erroneous POC BG values are frequently included in the EHR for ICU patients at one institution, 6 this project proves this hypothesis conclusively for all hospitalized patients at two large tertiary care hospitals. While untested, it is likely that our findings are applicable beyond our own institutions and that other hospitals may want to explore the option to give RNs and AP the opportunity to delete and repeat POC BG values that they believe are erroneous to prevent these values from being uploaded permanently into the EHR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Factors that physicians should consider for an appropriate and excellent glucose measurement and reporting system should include cost, accuracy, and time to result. [10] Several studies showed that POC blood glucose measurement with fingerstick capillary glucose measurement has high inaccuracy rate and seems to overestimate blood glucose levels[111213141516] in critically ill patients, especially those who are hypotensive, anemic, hypoxemic, have erythrocytosis, or receive vasopressors. [171819] This study compares the results of bedside blood glucose measurement versus laboratory blood glucose measurement in critically ill patients with intensive insulin therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%