1983
DOI: 10.1107/s010876738300080x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point-group determination by convergent-beam electron diffraction

Abstract: The method of point-group determination from convergent-beam electron diffraction patterns has been established by Buxton, Eades, Steeds & Rackham [Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London (1976), 281, 171-194]. However, Table 2 given by them is inconvenient for practical purposes, since many symmetries of the dark-field and +G dark-field patterns are not given and are left for the reader's consideration. The table is improved and completed with the help of some new symmetry symbols and illustration of symmetries. The n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in perfect agreement with the 2mmlR projection diffraction group (Fig. 3b) [2]. Since this diffraction group only corresponds to the m3m point group, the space group for the 03B3 phase is therefore Fm3m.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in perfect agreement with the 2mmlR projection diffraction group (Fig. 3b) [2]. Since this diffraction group only corresponds to the m3m point group, the space group for the 03B3 phase is therefore Fm3m.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…It is explained how to overcome the experimental difficulties connected with the small crystal size, the texture of the specimen and the absence of HOLZ reflections on most diffraction patterns. [1] or by a "multibeam" method proposed by Tanaka [2]. The space group can also be inferred from observation of Gjonnes and Moodie lines of dynamical absence present on CBED patterns [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the symmetrical many-beam CBED patterns (Tanaka, Saito & Sekii, 1983), the GM-line rules are modified. However, the new tables for the symmetrical manybeam cases are not necessary, since the modification is not complicated.…”
Section: Gm Lines In a Symmetrical Many-beam Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common application is to identify known structures and their orientations, but CBED has also been used to determine accurate unit-cell dimensions (Jones, Rackham & Steeds, 1977), structure symmetries (Goodman, 1975;Tanaka, Saito & Sekii, 1983) and even atomic positions (Vincent, Bird & Steeds, 1984). Strain fields around defects (Fung, 1985;Carpenter & Spence, 1982), specimen thicknesses (Kelly, Jostsons, Blake & Napier, 1975;Kirkland, Loane, Xu & Silcox, 1989), ionicity (Zuo, Spence & O'Keeffe, 1988) and the phase of complex atomic structure factors (Zuo, Spence & H¢ier, 1989;Bird, James & Preston, 1987) have also been determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%