2015
DOI: 10.1016/bs.semsem.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point Defects in Silicon Carbide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2, the present preliminary result of the displacement cross section is compared with the previous experimental data and the calculation. The present data showed overestimation about 4 times of the calculation with the NRT model as similar to the previous experiment carried out lower energy [8,9]. It was also shown that the PHITS with the improved model of Nordlund showed remarkably good agreement with the experimental data.…”
Section: Comparison Between Experiments and Calculationsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2, the present preliminary result of the displacement cross section is compared with the previous experimental data and the calculation. The present data showed overestimation about 4 times of the calculation with the NRT model as similar to the previous experiment carried out lower energy [8,9]. It was also shown that the PHITS with the improved model of Nordlund showed remarkably good agreement with the experimental data.…”
Section: Comparison Between Experiments and Calculationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Comparison of the present experiment data with the previous experiment[8,9,13] and calculation results with PHITS as a function of kinetic energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since many reaction channels open above 20 MeV, the calculation codes based on the intra-nuclear cascade model are utilized to obtain the cross section. So far, the experimental data carried out Kyoto University [7] and BNL/AGS [8] are available above 20 MeV. It was reported that the displacement cross section of tungsten calculated with the MARS code[9] has 8 times difference in various calculation models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%