1976
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(76)90139-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point defect sink strengths and void-swelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of understanding of void formation behaviour at the atomic scale has adversely affected the development of advanced theoretical models to predict void evolution under irradiation. This is evidenced by the fact that existing models [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] cannot accurately predict the void evolution at the atomic level that is experimentally observed in the current study. Specifically, it is observed here that the void formation is largely controlled by the atomic process on the void surfaces, a phenomenon that has not been reported before and can only be observed in situ at atomic scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The lack of understanding of void formation behaviour at the atomic scale has adversely affected the development of advanced theoretical models to predict void evolution under irradiation. This is evidenced by the fact that existing models [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] cannot accurately predict the void evolution at the atomic level that is experimentally observed in the current study. Specifically, it is observed here that the void formation is largely controlled by the atomic process on the void surfaces, a phenomenon that has not been reported before and can only be observed in situ at atomic scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In this purpose, we follow the approach proposed by Brailsford et al [34] and already used by Smetniansky-De-Grande and Barbu in their modeling of the precipitation kinetics in Fe-Cu alloys [35,36]. When calculating the monomer condensation rate on a given cluster, we assume that at distances greater than r ext , one half of the mean distance between precipitates, monomers feel influence of the cluster through its diffusion field as well as the one arising from other clusters through an effective medium characterized by a parameter k. The rate at which this effective medium absorbs monomers is given by D X k 2 (C 1 − C eq 1 ), C 1 and C eq 1 being respectively the instantaneous and the equilibrium monomer concentrations.…”
Section: Effect Of the Overlap Of Diffusion Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expression, equation 9, is a standard result of rate theory [13]. At large times the result is C(«) = G/DS, a result often used to calculate the concentration when recombination is neglected.…”
Section: Cascade-induced Creepmentioning
confidence: 99%