2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.03.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point clouds learning with attention-based graph convolution networks

Abstract: Point clouds data, as one kind of representation of 3D objects, are the most primitive output obtained by 3D sensors. Unlike 2D images, point clouds are disordered and unstructured. Hence it is not straightforward to apply classification techniques such as the convolution neural network to point clouds analysis directly. To solve this problem, we propose a novel network structure, named Attention-based Graph Convolution Networks (AGCN), to extract point clouds features. Taking the learning process as a message… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows the classification results of the proposed DNet compared with the other sixteen advanced networks. As shown in the “input” column of Table 1 , the methods, including the Spec-GCN [ 15 ], Pointconv [ 6 ], AGCN [ 41 ], PointNet++ [ 21 ], SpiderCNN [ 7 ] and SO-Net [ 28 ], require coordinates of point cloud as well as normal information as the input of their networks, while the other eleven comparison networks and the proposed DNet only need the coordinates of point cloud. Moreover, the networks listed in the last three (PointNet++ [ 21 ], SpiderCNN [ 7 ] and SO-Net [ 28 ]) for comparison use 5k points, rather than 1k points as other networks do.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 shows the classification results of the proposed DNet compared with the other sixteen advanced networks. As shown in the “input” column of Table 1 , the methods, including the Spec-GCN [ 15 ], Pointconv [ 6 ], AGCN [ 41 ], PointNet++ [ 21 ], SpiderCNN [ 7 ] and SO-Net [ 28 ], require coordinates of point cloud as well as normal information as the input of their networks, while the other eleven comparison networks and the proposed DNet only need the coordinates of point cloud. Moreover, the networks listed in the last three (PointNet++ [ 21 ], SpiderCNN [ 7 ] and SO-Net [ 28 ]) for comparison use 5k points, rather than 1k points as other networks do.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attention mechanism was used for weighting aggregation of point features in local regions [ 17 , 39 , 40 , 41 ], and it is also important for neighborhood learning. Chen et al [ 17 ] used graph attention mechanism to learn local geometric representations of point clouds.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model projects the features of disordered points onto the ordered sequence of feature vectors, which are then fed into the recurrent neural network for learning. Besides, Graph Convolutional Neural Networks [30][31][32] and Multi-scale Graph Convolutional Neural Networks [15,33] also are used to deal with irregular data structure. Mao et al [16] and Thomas et al [17] present new convolution methods to extract local features.…”
Section: End-to-end Learning Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By constructing a graph on a point cloud, the graph convolution operation can extract the local feature of a point and the points around it in the graph. Both [6] and [12] have constructed a graph before applying graph convolution, however, they only learn the information from the points nearby. It needs the networks to downsample the point clouds for learning global semantic information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%