2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3013706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point Cloud Registration Algorithm Based on the Grey Wolf Optimizer

Abstract: In view of the long computation time and low registration accuracy of the current point cloud registration algorithm, a point cloud registration algorithm based on the grey wolf optimizer (GWO) is proposed, denoted PCR-GW. The algorithm uses the centralization method to solve the translation matrix and then simplifies the points of the initial point cloud models by using the intrinsic shape signatures (ISS) feature. Next, various parameters of the rotation matrix are obtained via the GWO algorithm by employing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference [14] created short connections to aggregate features in different layers. Reference [15] derives a resolution-based feature combination module and a boundary-preserving optimization strategy. Reference [16] iteratively aggregated deep features to exploit the complementary saliency information between multilevel features and features in each individual layer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [14] created short connections to aggregate features in different layers. Reference [15] derives a resolution-based feature combination module and a boundary-preserving optimization strategy. Reference [16] iteratively aggregated deep features to exploit the complementary saliency information between multilevel features and features in each individual layer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feng et al proposed a point cloud registration algorithm based on gray wolf optimizer (GWO), which uses a centralization method to solve the translation matrix. Subsequently, the inherent shape features are employed to simplify the points of the initial point cloud model, and the quadratic sum of the distances between the corresponding points in the simplified point cloud is utilized as the objective function [63]. The various parameters of the rotation matrix are obtained through the GWO algorithm, which effectively balances the global and local optimization ability to obtain the optimal value in a short time.…”
Section: Registration Methods Based On Mathematical Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Scale-ICP and GO-ICP are not suitable for registering point clouds that are affine transformed, so they are not compared here. We compared the following three methods Affine-ICP [14], MDAR [15], PCR-GW [19], Whitening-ICP [20] and CPD [22]. The registration result is shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Affine Registration Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ICPbased algorithms show good registration results on some simple point registration. Feng et al proposed the PCR-GW algorithm [19], the algorithm is based on the gray wolf optimizer to register point clouds, and it improves the registration speed and registration accuracy. Shu et al proposed the Whitening-ICP algorithm [20], the registration error of it was small and it reduced the computational complexity of point cloud affine registration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%