2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point-based Jacobian formulation for computational kinematics of manipulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one is to formulate a dimensionally homogeneous Jacobian in which all entries have the same physical units. The methods available for doing so include: (1) a length-based method, in which all translational elements in the Jacobian are normalized with the help of a "characteristic/natural length" [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]; however, this method depends on the choice of the characteristic length, and -although a "best" characteristic length can be defined by optimization notions [6] -the choice of an appropriate characteristic length and with this the combination of translational and rotational metrics for a particular operation is not unique; and (2) the point-based method, which makes use of linear maps between the joint rates and velocities of several points on the platform to overcome the problem of non-existence of a bi-invariant metric for combined rotation and translation [9][10][11][12][13]; however, defining good criteria for choosing proper points is an open issue needing investigation, as the locations of these points affect the algebraic characteristics of the Jacobian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is to formulate a dimensionally homogeneous Jacobian in which all entries have the same physical units. The methods available for doing so include: (1) a length-based method, in which all translational elements in the Jacobian are normalized with the help of a "characteristic/natural length" [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]; however, this method depends on the choice of the characteristic length, and -although a "best" characteristic length can be defined by optimization notions [6] -the choice of an appropriate characteristic length and with this the combination of translational and rotational metrics for a particular operation is not unique; and (2) the point-based method, which makes use of linear maps between the joint rates and velocities of several points on the platform to overcome the problem of non-existence of a bi-invariant metric for combined rotation and translation [9][10][11][12][13]; however, defining good criteria for choosing proper points is an open issue needing investigation, as the locations of these points affect the algebraic characteristics of the Jacobian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software solves the forward position problem of planar and spatial mechanisms with lower pairs, obtaining the trajectories of the selected points. Furthermore, the software includes other modules to analyse velocities [32] and likewise analyse of singular positions [33] and calculate workspace. The figures presented in this section are directly extracted from the simulation software.…”
Section: Preliminary Results On the Convergence Of Gimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Using natural length or characteristic length [27][28][29] • Using scaling matrix [30,31] • Using weighting factor [32] • By using power transition concept [33] • Point-based method [34][35][36][37] • General and systematic method [38] • Homogeneous extended Jacobian matrix [39]…”
Section: Jacobian Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%