2014
DOI: 10.1214/14-aop908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poincaré and logarithmic Sobolev inequalities by decomposition of the energy landscape

Abstract: We consider a diffusion on a potential landscape which is given by a smooth Hamiltonian H : R n → R in the regime of low temperature ε. We proof the Eyring-Kramers formula for the optimal constant in the Poincaré (PI) and logarithmic Sobolev inequality (LSI) for the associated generator L = ε∆ − ∇H · ∇ of the diffusion. The proof is based on a refinement of the two-scale approach introduced by Grunewald et al. [Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 45 (2009) 302-351] and of the mean-difference estimate intro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
94
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, it turns out that these estimates on the LSI constant do not coincide with the Eyring-Cramer formula. Additionally, we expect that the estimates on LSI constant obtained by this approach are sharp (for details see [MS12]). …”
Section: Results and Sketch Of Proofmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Surprisingly, it turns out that these estimates on the LSI constant do not coincide with the Eyring-Cramer formula. Additionally, we expect that the estimates on LSI constant obtained by this approach are sharp (for details see [MS12]). …”
Section: Results and Sketch Of Proofmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Let us only consider an one-dimensional Hamiltonian H, even if the results holds in any dimension. Additionally for this short note, we will not discuss some standard growth conditions and nondegeneracy conditions on the Hamiltonian H. For precise statements, we refer the reader to the preprint [MS12] of both authors. With these simplifications, the Eyring-Kramers formula becomes:…”
Section: Results and Sketch Of Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Fisher information may enter the description and analysis of a Statistical Mechanics model in various ways: through functional inequalities, prominently the Log-Sobolev and HWI inequality (see e.g. [1] and references therein and in particular [18] for the β → ∞ regime considered here); as rate functional in Large deviation principles describing fluctuations of the empirical occupation measure of (1.3) when t → ∞, [5]; or also as a tool to give an alternative construction of the dynamics (1.2) as gradient flow with respect to the relative entropy functional [12] (see also the discussion at the end of this introduction).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%