2019
DOI: 10.7203/ciriec-e.97.13046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

¿Podría estar contribuyendo el cooperativismo a fijar la población en el territorio de Andalucía?

Abstract: En Andalucía las zonas rurales presentan marcadas desventajas frente a las urbanas, como son la falta de infraestructura, la escasez de servicios básicos o la falta de dinámicas económicas que provocan éxodo rural, entre otras, lo que genera desequilibrios territoriales en la región. Este éxodo rural, a su vez, influye como limitador de la generación de estas dinámicas, provocando un creciente envejecimiento de la población y mermando las oportunidades de desarrollo del territorio. Ante esta problemática, las … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, Andalusian rural society can contribute to a reduction in the social and regional inequalities that are beginning to entrench themselves in Europe. In this regard, cooperatives and their social innovations could contribute to anchoring the population to the land [65]. Not in vain, traditional agriculture has a human dimension, it is the backbone of the territory, it is anchored in rural towns, and it is more environmentally sustainable than capital-intensive agriculture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, Andalusian rural society can contribute to a reduction in the social and regional inequalities that are beginning to entrench themselves in Europe. In this regard, cooperatives and their social innovations could contribute to anchoring the population to the land [65]. Not in vain, traditional agriculture has a human dimension, it is the backbone of the territory, it is anchored in rural towns, and it is more environmentally sustainable than capital-intensive agriculture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, they participate in the maintenance of local economic activity, giving priority to environmental activities, and generate/reinvest wealth in their environment by helping to improve economic, social, and environmental cohesion, which highlights their commitment both to the community and to the environment [124]. As a consequence of all of the above, social economy companies collaborate in anchoring the population to the territory [18,26,34,125] In short, the bottom-up vision, taken by the social economy, drives development processes by placing local actors as a strategic element in local initiatives, which increases the efficiency of public policies [126] as citizens participate in their design and management, shaping them according to their needs.…”
Section: Social Economy Institutions Endogenous Development and Population Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies establish a theoretical framework for demonstrating that social economy companies are involved in the process of local development and consequently in population fixation [21,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. The main contribution of this work is to present an empirical process analysis model that demonstrates both the direction of the relationships between this type of company and population fixation, as well as their intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the previous deep economic crisis caused the majority of recovering companies to become cooperatives of associated work. Cooperatives consequently facilitate the territorial development of their regions [25]. Therefore, the contribution of these companies is undisputed today, with cooperatives having an important presence in many business sectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%