2018
DOI: 10.1109/tvcg.2017.2745078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Podium: Ranking Data Using Mixed-Initiative Visual Analytics

Abstract: People often rank and order data points as a vital part of making decisions. Multi-attribute ranking systems are a common tool used to make these data-driven decisions. Such systems often take the form of a table-based visualization in which users assign weights to the attributes representing the quantifiable importance of each attribute to a decision, which the system then uses to compute a ranking of the data. However, these systems assume that users are able to quantify their conceptual understanding of how… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these tools do not employ machine learning for relevance classification and do not integrate user feedback to improve their underlying models or algorithms. Visual analytics has also been increasingly used to improve various machine learning processes, such as feature selection [13], attribute weighting [48], and labeling [8,9,18], and even understanding the models themselves [22,39,42]. Sacha et al [40] proposed a framework to discuss the various forms of human interaction with machine learning models in visual analytics systems and theorized that VA tools could increase knowledge and usability of machine learning components.…”
Section: Visual Analytics and Interactive Learning For Situational Awmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these tools do not employ machine learning for relevance classification and do not integrate user feedback to improve their underlying models or algorithms. Visual analytics has also been increasingly used to improve various machine learning processes, such as feature selection [13], attribute weighting [48], and labeling [8,9,18], and even understanding the models themselves [22,39,42]. Sacha et al [40] proposed a framework to discuss the various forms of human interaction with machine learning models in visual analytics systems and theorized that VA tools could increase knowledge and usability of machine learning components.…”
Section: Visual Analytics and Interactive Learning For Situational Awmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scope of the grouping is confined to similar commits in each stem to preserve the temporal sequence and topology. We exploit the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) model in calculating similarity since this model is intuitive for users to understand and is known to serve exploration well [69,74]. To measure similarity, we choose five criteria from the commit metadata (i.e., author, commit date, commit type, file, and message).…”
Section: Commit Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some researchers have also enabled direct manipulation of graphical encodings in other visualization types. This includes the direct manipulation of: position of cells in table visualizations to either steer the underlying ranking model [46] or explore rankings [31,44]; angle of a pie chart segment to navigate the time dimension [20]; rows and columns in matrix visualizations [30,42]; nodes in tree visualizations [45]; and position of tokens in unit based visualizations [16].…”
Section: Other Visualization Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%