Street, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10018, USA (BJH and RJF) Habitat loss and fragmentation present major challenges for wildlife conservation since 19 connectivity between suitable habitat patches is needed for dispersal, allowing for genetic forested habitat patches. In the context of connectivity, marginal habitat for a species can be 39 defined as habitat that the species traverses or occupies at low densities between optimal patches.
40Connectivity is important for wildlife on 2 scales: 1) individuals of wide-ranging species must 41 move through marginal habitat to reach optimal habitat patches, for example jaguars (Panthera been suggested that pacas tend to be more patchily distributed in mosaic landscapes with 60 scattered resources (Marcus 1984; Beck-King et al. 1999;Ulloa et al. 1999). (Hess 1994;Wright et al. 2000). We investigated the extent to 69 which pacas make use of marginal habitat so that we can better understand the potential for 70 population connectivity, and the associated threats to continued connectivity. This study is the 71 first to document home ranges and habitat selection of pacas outside a state-recognized and 72 established protected area.
73
MATERIAL AND METHODS
74Study area.-The study site was located in the Central Belize Corridor, a human-
149
RESULTS
150Trapping and radio telemetry.-Six adult pacas (4 males and 2 females) were collared and 151 tracked over a 2-year period, yielding 982 reliable locations. We subsampled these to 267 152 independent animal locations, mainly in the wet seasons (91%), and the remainder in the early or Pacas had 95 % kernel home ranges of 68.8 to 212.7 ha (X ഥ = 130.6 ± 51.8 SD, n = 6).
155Males had 95 % kernel home ranges of 117.6 to 212.7 ha (X ഥ = 161.5 ± 39.3 SD, n = 4), whereas 156 both females had 95 % kernel home ranges of 68.8 ha (X ഥ = 68.8 ± 0 SD, n = 2; Fig. 2). The mean 157 home range of a male was approximately 2.3 times larger than the mean home range of a female 158 (t = 4.7, d.f. = 3, P < 0.05). Males had core areas (50% kernel area) of 18.1 to 43.2 ha (X ഥ = 31.8 ± 159 9.0 SD, n = 4) and females had core areas of 10.3 to 13 ha (X ഥ = 11.6 ± 1.4 SD, n = 2). The mean 160 core area of males was 2.7 times larger than that of females (t = 3.7, d.f. = 3.4, P < 0.05). MCPs 161 of males ranged from 87.5 to 204.9 ha (X ഥ = 134.7 ± 43.1 SD, n = 4) and MCPs of females from 162 50.7 to 86.7 ha (X ഥ = 68.7 ± 18 SD, n = 2).
163Habitat use and selection.-The proportion of habitats within the home ranges of the pacas 164 was a non-random subset of proportions of available habitats in the study area (second order 165 habitat selection randomization test, Λ = 0.0004, P < 0.05). On average, 46 % of the habitat 166 within the home ranges was savannah with dense trees, whereas this habitat type comprised only 167 15 % of the vegetation cover in the overall study area (Table 2). Thirty-six percent of the habitat 168 in the home ranges was short grass savannah with scattered trees and shrubs; this habitat covered 169 44 % of the entire study area...