2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gheart.2018.09.479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PO620 Reduction of Heart Rate With Ivabradine In Severe Aortic Stenosis: Clinical, Echocardiographic and Hemodynamic Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five studies have evaluated the use of ivabradine in patients with severe AS (Table 3). 53–57 Although no differences were noted in HR reduction, one study found ivabradine was associated with an increased LVEF compared to baseline therapy with β‐blockers 53 . Three studies found ivabradine decreased HR; two of these observed improvements in both LVEF and exercise tolerance 54–56 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five studies have evaluated the use of ivabradine in patients with severe AS (Table 3). 53–57 Although no differences were noted in HR reduction, one study found ivabradine was associated with an increased LVEF compared to baseline therapy with β‐blockers 53 . Three studies found ivabradine decreased HR; two of these observed improvements in both LVEF and exercise tolerance 54–56 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 53–57 Although no differences were noted in HR reduction, one study found ivabradine was associated with an increased LVEF compared to baseline therapy with β‐blockers 53 . Three studies found ivabradine decreased HR; two of these observed improvements in both LVEF and exercise tolerance 54–56 . In a study of 98 patients with severe AS, sinus rhythm, and preserved ejection fraction who were followed for 2.6 years, ivabradine was associated with a significantly lower risk of death from any cause, hospitalization, or the composite compared to standard care (e.g., β‐blockers) 57 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%