2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(12)72308-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Po-342 Measurements of an Electronic Brachytherapy Source With a Brachytherapy Dose Verification Phantom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are not the first to report difficulties with this chamber. Issues with modeling and performing measurements with the PTW 34013 in the context of electronic brachytherapy have been previously reported (Rivard et al 2006, Pike 2012, Fulkerson et al 2014. It is recommended that alternative soft x-ray ionization chambers with desirable qualities such as a more precise knowledge of dimensions, inclusion of a guard ring, and waterproof construction (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are not the first to report difficulties with this chamber. Issues with modeling and performing measurements with the PTW 34013 in the context of electronic brachytherapy have been previously reported (Rivard et al 2006, Pike 2012, Fulkerson et al 2014. It is recommended that alternative soft x-ray ionization chambers with desirable qualities such as a more precise knowledge of dimensions, inclusion of a guard ring, and waterproof construction (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of each of these tallies for dose calculation has some advantages and drawbacks. However, considering the negligible range of secondary electrons in solid or liquid media at photon energies lower than 200 keV ( 38 ), and the presence of negligible radiative losses ( 39 ), and since total kerma has about the same magnitude as the collision kerma ( 38 ), the absorbed dose can be approximated by collision kerma ( 39 ) and therefore F6 tally was recognized as the best option for this calculation. This tally is known as the track length estimate of energy deposition, or as the heating or energy deposition tally, and is faster than other tallies of dose calculation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%