1984
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90467-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pneumogastrography in the diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Plain radiography can demonstrate 55% to 85% of patients with pneumoperitoneum. 2,3 However, diagnosis based on this method has practical limitations. Because many patients are too sick or debilitated to stand for chest radiographic examinations, a left lateral decubitus (LLD) abdominal radiograph may also be used to attempt to demonstrate pneumoperitoneum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Plain radiography can demonstrate 55% to 85% of patients with pneumoperitoneum. 2,3 However, diagnosis based on this method has practical limitations. Because many patients are too sick or debilitated to stand for chest radiographic examinations, a left lateral decubitus (LLD) abdominal radiograph may also be used to attempt to demonstrate pneumoperitoneum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because pneumoperitoneum is not objectifiable in 30-35% of those perforated, an alternative is pneumogastrophagy, which consists of injecting air into the stomach through the nasogastric tube. In this way, a pneumoperitoneum could become visible and have a more accurate diagnosis, reducing to one-third the time between perforation and surgery and therefore also decreasing mortality to one-third (K. Maull [6]).…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Computed tomography is more accurate than plain radiography, but it is not cost-effective and associated with more radiation exposure. 3,4 Ultrasonography, because of its mobility and ease of use, may be an alternative choice for diagnosing of pneumoperitoneum. Several studies with limited sample size reported the ability of ultrasonography in diagnosing of pneumoperitoneum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only 55%–85% of pneumoperitoneum could be detected by abdominal X‐ray plain film 2 , 3 . Computed tomography is more accurate than plain radiography, but it is not cost‐effective and associated with more radiation exposure 3 , 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%