Pmc38 Use of a Mobile Phoneto Administer Visual Analogue Scales (Vas)

Tiplady, B.; Cairns, William James; Sturdee, Miriam; Oshinowo, B; Thomson, Jon; Drummond, GB; Wright, Phillip E.

doi:10.1016/s1098-3015(10)70572-6

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In all cases, the number of horizontal pixels comprising each line enabled an integer score of any value between 0 and 100 to be recorded, in common with the manual measurement of the paper version to the nearest millimeter. These results support currently understood properties of the VAS, whereby scale length is understood not to affect measurement properties (see [12], for example, comparing a 21 mm VAS on a mobile phone to the 100 mm paper version). Some subjects (16 of 155) in this study were unable to complete the BYOD assessment because of their inability to download or run the app.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Scale Types Collected Using Bring Your Own Device Compared to Paper and a Provisioned Device: Results of a Randomized Equivalence Trial

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Scale Types Collected Using Bring Your Own Device Compared to Paper and a Provisioned Device: Results of a Randomized Equivalence Trial

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Unfortunately, the equipment used involved subjects wearing goggles and headphones connected to a computer, potentially hampering communication and impairing bedside access [9]. It is now possible to perform similar tests of visual reaction time using handheld computers [10], or specially programmed mobile telephones [11].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of a new method of assessing depth of sedation using two‐choice visual reaction time testing on a mobile phone*

Thomson¹,

Nimmo²,

Tiplady³

et al. 2008

Anaesthesia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryThe utility of two‐choice visual reaction time testing using a specially programmed mobile telephone as a measure of sedation level was investigated in 20 healthy patients sedated with target controlled infusions of propofol. At gradually increasing target concentrations visual reaction time was compared with patient‐assessed visual analogue scale sedation scores and an observer‐rated scale. Propofol sedation caused dose‐dependent increases in visual reaction time and visual analogue scale scores that were statistically significant when the calculated effect‐site concentration reached 0.9 μg.ml−1 (p < 0.05) and 0.5 μg.ml−1 (p < 0.01) respectively. While visual analogue scale scores were more sensitive at lower levels of sedation than visual reaction time, the latter demonstrated marked increase in values at higher levels of sedation. Visual reaction time may be useful for identifying impending over‐sedation.

show abstract

Pmc38 Use of a Mobile Phoneto Administer Visual Analogue Scales (Vas)

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Scale Types Collected Using Bring Your Own Device Compared to Paper and a Provisioned Device: Results of a Randomized Equivalence Trial

Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Scale Types Collected Using Bring Your Own Device Compared to Paper and a Provisioned Device: Results of a Randomized Equivalence Trial

Evaluation of a new method of assessing depth of sedation using two‐choice visual reaction time testing on a mobile phone*

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About