2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gheart.2016.03.413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PM288 Adherence to Secondary Prophylaxis for Patients Diagnosed With Rheumatic Heart Disease by Echocardiographic Screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Furthermore, different studies reported reasons for poor adherence were lack of money, far distance from hospital, fear of medication side effects and painful injection, lack of awareness of the importance of BPG, and non-availability of BPG. 15,24,25 On the contrary, the adherence rate of the present study (80.6%) was less than that of Indian and New Zealand studies which reported (89.6%) 26 and (92%) 27 respectively. Another prospective study conducted in India also showed the overall adherence rate of 93.6%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…23 Furthermore, different studies reported reasons for poor adherence were lack of money, far distance from hospital, fear of medication side effects and painful injection, lack of awareness of the importance of BPG, and non-availability of BPG. 15,24,25 On the contrary, the adherence rate of the present study (80.6%) was less than that of Indian and New Zealand studies which reported (89.6%) 26 and (92%) 27 respectively. Another prospective study conducted in India also showed the overall adherence rate of 93.6%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…31 However, our figure was considerably higher than that found by Sayed (29.5%), 44 Thompson et al (48.7%), 48 Prasad et al (50%), 46 Musoke et al (54%), 53 Gasse et al (54%), 38 Mohammed et al (55.2%), 29 Huck et al (58%), 43 and Harrington et al (59%). 34 On the other hand, it was considerably less than of Saxena et al (93.6%), 52 Culliford-Semmens et al (92%), 54 Kumar et al (90%), 45 Mekonnen et al (80.6%), 37 and Sial et al (73.5%). 55 Abbreviations: RHD, rheumatic heart disease; NYHA, New York Heart Association.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…(92%) due to the socio-demographic difference of our patients and New Zealand and design difference (29,30) . Opposing the finding of the present study, highest adherence of RHD patients to secondary prophylaxis was also reported by studies of Sial et al (73.5%), Saxena et al (93.6%) may be due to study design and sociodemographic difference (31,32) .…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 97%