1979
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1979.82.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PM-normality and the insertion of a continuous function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…can show that X is Oz by using the fact that every point of X is a zero set and the fact that FT is Oz. This establishes that regular closed sets are C*-embedded since Oz-spaces are metanormal [15] and [19].…”
Section: I) a Dense Subset Of An Open Set Is R*-embedded If Given Twomentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…can show that X is Oz by using the fact that every point of X is a zero set and the fact that FT is Oz. This establishes that regular closed sets are C*-embedded since Oz-spaces are metanormal [15] and [19].…”
Section: I) a Dense Subset Of An Open Set Is R*-embedded If Given Twomentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Lane [15] and Shchepin [19] have shown that every Oz-space is MN and Noble [18] has shown that the product of real lines is Oz. EXAMPLE 4.9.…”
Section: I) a Dense Subset Of An Open Set Is R*-embedded If Given Twomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the KatEtov-Tong and Tietze-Urysohn theorems hold true for normal L-fuzzy topological spaces, as proved in [17] by utilizing Kat6tov's method of proof (see also [18] for further generalization a la BLAIR [3] and LANE [21]). We notice that the techniques of BONAN and SCOTT work in the fuzzy situation as well.…”
Section: (C)])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of Blatter and Seever in [3 and 4] require that the classes U(X) and L(X) can be characterized as cn(A) and cñ(B), respectively, for some sublattices A and B of the power set of X and that Ac B& (= intersection of sequences in B) and B c At (= union of sequences in A). The necessary (as proved by Powderly [13]) and sufficient condition of [7] places restrictions on the function f -g. These limitations are avoided in Theorem 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%