2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-40643-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PLS and Functional Neuroimaging: Bias and Detection Power Across Different Resampling Schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We randomly select a part of negative and positive samples for training SVM [8,9,8,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18],PLS [19][20][21][22][23] and LSSVM [24][25][26][27][28] classifiers and the rest for testing.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We randomly select a part of negative and positive samples for training SVM [8,9,8,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18],PLS [19][20][21][22][23] and LSSVM [24][25][26][27][28] classifiers and the rest for testing.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we used a data-driven contrast-based PLS approach with NPAIRS split-half cross-validation on an optimized PCA subspace, providing full model flexibility within the space of our neuroimaging data. Split-half resampling was chosen over bootstrapping and split-half stability, as PLS estimates using these methods may consequently result in an upward bias of the predicted correlations (Churchill et al, 2013 , 2014 ; Kovacevic et al, 2013 ). We chose the PCA subspace ( k = 11 ) that simultaneously maximized prediction and reproducibility, thereby controlling for bias and adaptively removing noise variability within our dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reproducibility of the two split-half brain patterns was measured as the correlation of all paired LVs, r spatial = ρ( E 1 , E 2 ), which measures the stability of the latent brain patterns across independent split-halves. The PLS analysis was executed on an adaptive optimized PC-subspace maximizing the contrast-correlation and the spatial reproducibility, as described in Churchill et al ( 2013 , 2014 ). A mathematical derivation and explanation of this procedure can be found in the Supplementary Material .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimensions 2 and 3 accounted for 24.24% (SV = 762, p < .0001) and 6.57% (SV = 397, p < .0001) respectively. A split-half procedure was employed to assess reproducibility (Z > 1.95) of the SV and latent variables in each dimension (Churchill et al, 2016(Churchill et al, , 2013McIntosh, 2021). The correlation between network reconfiguration and cognition latent variables measures association strength (Ziegler et al, 2013).…”
Section: Plsc Describes Two Significant and Reproducible Latent Dimen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the reproducibility of the SVs, we performed a split-half PLSC procedure (Churchill et al, 2016(Churchill et al, , 2013McIntosh, 2021). In each iteration, the data was split into random split-half samples, and the singular value decomposition was conducted on both halves.…”
Section: Reproducibility Of Plsc Dimensions and Loadingsmentioning
confidence: 99%