2008
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2008.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plk1 depletion in nontransformed diploid cells activates the DNA-damage checkpoint

Abstract: We previously reported that polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) depletion by lentivirus-based RNA interference led to mitotic arrest and apoptosis in cancer cells, whereas normal diploid cell lines, hTERT-RPE1 and MCF10A, survived a similar level of depletion. To study homogeneous cell lines, we generated several Plk1-depleted hTERT-RPE1 and MCF10A clones that were derived from single cells depleted of Plk1. We found that in the long term, Plk1 depletion slowed proliferation of hTERT-RPE1 cells, apparently due to attenu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, depletion of Plk1 by small-interfering RNA is not able to totally knock out Plk1 and the remaining Plk1 may not be sufficient for survival of Plk1-addicted cancer cells, but for normal cells. This is in accordance with a recent report 49 that sensitivity of normal cells to Plk1 depletion is dependent on the depletion level. However, an interesting review by Lens et al 50 suggests that it is unlikely to have Plk1-addicted cells, and the contribution of Plk1 to tumor formation might be largely due to the induction of chromosome instability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Alternatively, depletion of Plk1 by small-interfering RNA is not able to totally knock out Plk1 and the remaining Plk1 may not be sufficient for survival of Plk1-addicted cancer cells, but for normal cells. This is in accordance with a recent report 49 that sensitivity of normal cells to Plk1 depletion is dependent on the depletion level. However, an interesting review by Lens et al 50 suggests that it is unlikely to have Plk1-addicted cells, and the contribution of Plk1 to tumor formation might be largely due to the induction of chromosome instability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the face of chemotherapy-induced DNA damage and disordered cell replication, LB-1.2 up-regulates Akt-1, which has the potential to stimulate cell growth, and, at the same time, interferes with p53-mediated cell cycle arrest by stabilizing MDM2 (27). An increase in pAkt-1 activates Plk-1, interfering with activation of a checkpoint at G2/M (5,8) and activating TCTP by phosphorylation (21). Phosphorylation of TCTP decreases the stabilization of microtubules (22,23), which may contribute to the development of mitotic catastrophe after exposure of cancer cells to LB-1.2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies conducted at different time points during the progression from oocyte to embryo suggest that RSK1 and Plk1 share a close relationship. RSK1 inhibits the effects of Plk1-Myt1 interactions, and previous studies indicate that MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 are phosphorylated in Plk1-depleted cells (28); however, it is still not clear whether Plk1 interacts with RSK1 and/or how this pathway operates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%