2016
DOI: 10.5252/g2016n1a5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pliocene suids from Musaitu and Dermenji, Moldova: implications for understanding the origin of AfricanKolpochoerusVan Hoepen & Van Hoepen, 1932

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Group 2 consists of Kolpochoerus species, which likely includes Hylochoerus, and Group 3 consists of Metridiochoerus species, which have been considered to be the ancestors of Phacochoerus (Cooke, 1978;Harris & White, 1979;Kullmer, 1999). Potamochoerus has been put to its own group (Cooke, 1978;Harris & White, 1979), although other studies consider it as a part of the Kolpochoerus group (Bishop, 1999 (Pickford, 2012;Pickford & Obada, 2016).…”
Section: Overview Of the Fossil Suid Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Group 2 consists of Kolpochoerus species, which likely includes Hylochoerus, and Group 3 consists of Metridiochoerus species, which have been considered to be the ancestors of Phacochoerus (Cooke, 1978;Harris & White, 1979;Kullmer, 1999). Potamochoerus has been put to its own group (Cooke, 1978;Harris & White, 1979), although other studies consider it as a part of the Kolpochoerus group (Bishop, 1999 (Pickford, 2012;Pickford & Obada, 2016).…”
Section: Overview Of the Fossil Suid Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kolpochoerus and Metridiochoerus are part of the Suinae subfamily, like all present‐day suids. The ancestry of Kolpochoerus and Metridiochoerus has been suggested to be in the Eurasian Propotamochoerus (via Dasychoerus and Potamochoeroides , respectively), which dispersed into Africa in the late Miocene or early Pliocene (Pickford, ; Pickford & Obada, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berdondini [28] proposed the grouping of these samples, together with Sus strozzii and the recent S. verrucosus and S. celebensis, under the subgenus name Dasychoerus Gray, 1873, in accordance to their apparent morphological similarities and their assumed close phylogenetic relationships. This taxonomic view has been accepted by authors of more recent studies (e.g., [31][32][33]) who furthermore raised Dasychoerus to the generic rank, but was subsequently challenged in a new phylogenetic analysis which re-classified the species arvernensis and strozzii under the genus Sus [34]. Since there is no general agreement on the genus-level taxonomy of these species, the customarily used genus name Sus is applied here.…”
Section: Suidmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The genus Struthio is known from several Neogene localities and it is considered to exist at least till the late Pliocene (MN16) in the peri-Pontic region [21]. Sus arvernensis is a Pliocene species, predominantly Ruscinian (MN14-MN15), that is also widespread in the early Villafranchian (MN16) before evolving to the typical Villafranchian species S. strozzii [30,32]. Gazella bouvrainae is currently known only from localities dated to MN17 (MNQ17-MNQ18) [4].…”
Section: Biostratigraphy-palaeoecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trend towards shortening the post-canine diastema of the mandible that is observed in Potamochoeroides is taken to extreme in Metridiochoerus. It is also interesting to note that the mandibular ramus is greatly thickened in Potamochoeroides, even in the juveniles, and this character links the genus to Dasychoerus, one of the defining characters of which is the pachygnathic lower jaw, a feature that also links Dasychoerus to the genus Kolpochoerus (Pickford & Obada, 2016).…”
Section: A4 A5 A6mentioning
confidence: 99%