Abstract:In the Central Mediterranean the Africa‐Eurasia convergence led to the development of complex orogenic systems and back‐arc basins. Throughout Pliocene‐Quaternary times the Southern Apennines accretionary prism migrated toward the Apulia foreland and, contemporaneously, the Tyrrhenian Sea back‐arc basin opened. In this study, we investigated the offshore of the southern Apulia foreland and the Southern Apennines. Using seismic reflection profiles and well data in a dedicated GIS software, we made a detailed st… Show more
“…Massari and Prosser 2013;Zecchin 2005). The interpretation of the Crotone Basin in the framework of extensional basins formed eastwards of the Vavilov Basin (Milia et al, 2017b), is coherent with the position of the Calabria terrane close to the uplifted Cilento promontory (Fig. 13c).…”
Section: Quantification Of Extension and Normal Faults Architecturesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Between the first and second rifting stages of the SCM, a late Lower Pleistocene tectonic event affected the Tyrrhenian margin and the Northern boundary of the Calabrian terrane. This event was associated to: i) end of the continen-tal collision and lock of Southern Apennines thrust belt toward the Apulia foreland and contemporaneous translation of the Calabria terrane toward the Ionian oceanic foreland; and (ii) triggering of a wide NW-SE region of left-lateral faulting (Pollino shear zone), transtensional zones, and local popup structures, in the Southern Apennines and Tyrrhenian back-arc margin (Knott and Turco, 1991;Monaco et al, 2001;Schiattarella et al, 2005;Milia et al, 2009Milia et al, , 2017aMilia et al, , 2017b. Patacca et al (1990) dated this event to the Emilian-Sicilian boundary, an interpretation matched by Mattei et al (2007), who placed the end of contraction at~1 Ma, as proved by sealing of deformation by sediments of Sicilian age.…”
Section: Quantification Of Extension and Normal Faults Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Pleistocene the extension propagated toward the East. In the Middle-Upper Pleistocene, extension was localized on the Campania margin and propagate toward SE/ESE (Torrente and Milia, 2013;Milia and Torrente, 2015a;Milia et al, 2017a;2017b). The Middle-Upper Pleistocene crustal extension dismembered the Campania Margin and resulted in several rift basins like the Campania Plain, Gaeta Bay, Naples Bay and SCM basins ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the recent paper of Milia et al (2017aMilia et al ( , 2017b, previous geological works analyzed only limited part of the SCM. NE-trending normal faults that controlled a thick depocenter (>2 km, Mina 1 well) have been reported (Sacchi et al, 1994;Casciello et al, 2004) in the Salerno bay.…”
The Southern Campania Margin (SCM) represents a key area of the Central Mediterranean because it records all the rifting stages of the Tyrrhenian Sea. The interpretation of a seismic dataset calibrated with deep wells and outcrops, using seismic stratigraphy and structural geology methods in a dedicated Geographic Information System (GIS) environment, the seismic depth conversion, the generation of 2-D and 3-D models led to the reconstruction of a polyphased tectono-stratigraphic evolution of the SCM. During the early stage of Tyrrhenian opening a terrigenous transtensional Basin (Langhian-Tortonian Cilento Basin) formed on the Liguride accretionary prism adjacent to the Calabria crystalline terrane. In the SCM the Liguride thrust sheets tectonically overly the Apennine Platform units and both these nappes have been dismembered by Quaternary faults. Three rifting stages, not homogeneously distributed, affected the region since the Lower Pleistocene. They are associated to the deposition of a thick Quaternary succession (A, B and C units). During these Pleistocene stages there was an abrupt change of the extension direction (from NE-SW to NW-SE) accompanying a change of the nappe transport direction of the Southern Apennines. The construction of balanced sections using dedicated software, permitted us to recognize the true geometry of the faults and compute the amount of Quaternary extension of the SCM that results comparable to those calculated for other sectors of the Tyrrhenian margin and further extensional regions worldwide.
“…Massari and Prosser 2013;Zecchin 2005). The interpretation of the Crotone Basin in the framework of extensional basins formed eastwards of the Vavilov Basin (Milia et al, 2017b), is coherent with the position of the Calabria terrane close to the uplifted Cilento promontory (Fig. 13c).…”
Section: Quantification Of Extension and Normal Faults Architecturesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Between the first and second rifting stages of the SCM, a late Lower Pleistocene tectonic event affected the Tyrrhenian margin and the Northern boundary of the Calabrian terrane. This event was associated to: i) end of the continen-tal collision and lock of Southern Apennines thrust belt toward the Apulia foreland and contemporaneous translation of the Calabria terrane toward the Ionian oceanic foreland; and (ii) triggering of a wide NW-SE region of left-lateral faulting (Pollino shear zone), transtensional zones, and local popup structures, in the Southern Apennines and Tyrrhenian back-arc margin (Knott and Turco, 1991;Monaco et al, 2001;Schiattarella et al, 2005;Milia et al, 2009Milia et al, , 2017aMilia et al, , 2017b. Patacca et al (1990) dated this event to the Emilian-Sicilian boundary, an interpretation matched by Mattei et al (2007), who placed the end of contraction at~1 Ma, as proved by sealing of deformation by sediments of Sicilian age.…”
Section: Quantification Of Extension and Normal Faults Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Pleistocene the extension propagated toward the East. In the Middle-Upper Pleistocene, extension was localized on the Campania margin and propagate toward SE/ESE (Torrente and Milia, 2013;Milia and Torrente, 2015a;Milia et al, 2017a;2017b). The Middle-Upper Pleistocene crustal extension dismembered the Campania Margin and resulted in several rift basins like the Campania Plain, Gaeta Bay, Naples Bay and SCM basins ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the recent paper of Milia et al (2017aMilia et al ( , 2017b, previous geological works analyzed only limited part of the SCM. NE-trending normal faults that controlled a thick depocenter (>2 km, Mina 1 well) have been reported (Sacchi et al, 1994;Casciello et al, 2004) in the Salerno bay.…”
The Southern Campania Margin (SCM) represents a key area of the Central Mediterranean because it records all the rifting stages of the Tyrrhenian Sea. The interpretation of a seismic dataset calibrated with deep wells and outcrops, using seismic stratigraphy and structural geology methods in a dedicated Geographic Information System (GIS) environment, the seismic depth conversion, the generation of 2-D and 3-D models led to the reconstruction of a polyphased tectono-stratigraphic evolution of the SCM. During the early stage of Tyrrhenian opening a terrigenous transtensional Basin (Langhian-Tortonian Cilento Basin) formed on the Liguride accretionary prism adjacent to the Calabria crystalline terrane. In the SCM the Liguride thrust sheets tectonically overly the Apennine Platform units and both these nappes have been dismembered by Quaternary faults. Three rifting stages, not homogeneously distributed, affected the region since the Lower Pleistocene. They are associated to the deposition of a thick Quaternary succession (A, B and C units). During these Pleistocene stages there was an abrupt change of the extension direction (from NE-SW to NW-SE) accompanying a change of the nappe transport direction of the Southern Apennines. The construction of balanced sections using dedicated software, permitted us to recognize the true geometry of the faults and compute the amount of Quaternary extension of the SCM that results comparable to those calculated for other sectors of the Tyrrhenian margin and further extensional regions worldwide.
“…The original geometric relationships between these Messinian sedimentary basins have certainly been altered by the following transcurrent/transpressive tectonics that could have caused lateral dislocations (Van Dijk and Okkes, 1991;Van Dijk, 1994;Tansi et al, 2007;Spina et al, 2011;Milia et al, 2017d). Nevertheless, to investigate the crustal architecture of Messinian basins of Calabria we built a N-S geological sketch, orthogonal to E-W normal faults documented onshore and offshore, and made a stratigraphic correlation between the Messinian subunits (Fig.…”
Section: Tectonic Model Of the Messinian Sedimentary Basinsmentioning
The direction of extension and the architecture of the Messinian basins of the Central Mediterranean region is a controversial issue. By combining original stratigraphic analysis of wells and seismic profiles collected offshore and onshore Calabria, we reassess the tectonic evolution that controlled the sedimentation and basement deformation during Messinian times. Three main deep sedimentary basins in the Calabria area record a Messinian succession formed by two clays/shales-dominated subunits subdivided by a halite-dominated subunit. The correlation with the worldwide recognized stratigraphic features permit to define the chronology of the stratigraphic and tectonic events. Three main rift basins that opened in a N-S direction have been recognized. On the contrary a fourth supradetachment basin opened toward the East. We found that the basin subsidence was controlled by two stages of activity of normal faults and that Messinian rift basins evolve in a deep-water environment. The overall pattern of extensional faults of the Central Mediterranean corresponds to normal faults striking parallel to the trench and normal faults striking at an oblique angle to the trench (Fig. 14). In particular in Campania and Calabria regions are present two rifts parallel to trench and an intervening rift orthogonal to the trench. We maintain that the recognized Messinian rift basins can be interpreted according to the “Double-door saloon tectonics”.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.