2010
DOI: 10.3318/ijes.2010.28.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleistocene to Holocene Stratigraphy of Azokh 1 Cave, Lesser Caucasus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two potential interpretations can be considered here: 1) the archaeological material has been affected by post-depositional processes (other than trampling) such as transport caused by energetic water flow in the site. Such an interpretation is virtually impossible as recent sedimentological, stratigraphic and site formation studies Murray et al 2010;Murray et al (in press)) indicate no presence of strong, water-induced movements in the current excavation area in which the studied assemblages were found. 2) Some heavily altered artefacts may have been transported from elsewhere (e.g., a nearby river valley) for re-use or recycling purposes, abandoned in this area of the cave and subsequently exposed to further alteration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Two potential interpretations can be considered here: 1) the archaeological material has been affected by post-depositional processes (other than trampling) such as transport caused by energetic water flow in the site. Such an interpretation is virtually impossible as recent sedimentological, stratigraphic and site formation studies Murray et al 2010;Murray et al (in press)) indicate no presence of strong, water-induced movements in the current excavation area in which the studied assemblages were found. 2) Some heavily altered artefacts may have been transported from elsewhere (e.g., a nearby river valley) for re-use or recycling purposes, abandoned in this area of the cave and subsequently exposed to further alteration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In Azokh 1, nine stratigraphic units are identified, currently separated into two sediment sequences, which can no longer be readily correlated due to the removal of all the intervening stratigraphy (Fig. 2) (Murray et al 2010(Murray et al , 2016:…”
Section: Azokhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sediment Sequence 2: contains Units V to I. The new excavations focus on these units; all of them present an archaeological record, with an age range from the Middle (MIS 9-8) to the Late Pleistocene (MIS 5) (Units V to II), with some Holocene sediments at the top (Unit I) (Fernández-Jalvo et al 2010, 2016bMurray et al 2010;Asryan 2015;Asryan et al 2017Asryan et al , 2020.…”
Section: Azokhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The archaeological record of the site consists of macro‐ and micro‐faunal remains, lithic artefacts, hominin remains and charcoals. These were recovered from five different stratigraphic horizons (Units V–I) belonging to the upper sedimentary sequence preserved at the rear of the cave passage, and ranging in age from ~300 to 100 ka (Units V–II) and ~150 bp (Unit I) (Fernández‐Jalvo et al ; Murray et al , ; Asryan et al ; King et al , : for extensive results from an earlier phase of excavation work at the cave, see also Huseinov ; Lioubine ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This waste product may also have exerted an influence on the latter stages of development of the cave system itself (Domínguez‐Alonso et al ). Murray et al () reported the presence of tinsleyite (K‐ and Al‐rich hydrated phosphate) in parts of the sedimentary infill of Azokh 1 cave passage, including from Unit II. Previous workers have linked the syn‐diagenetic precipitation of this mineral to the presence of bat guano (Magela da Costa and Rúbia Ribeiro ; Marincea et al ; Shahack‐Gross et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%