2014
DOI: 10.1038/nature13422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleistocene cave art from Sulawesi, Indonesia

Abstract: Archaeologists have long been puzzled by the appearance in Europe ∼40-35 thousand years (kyr) ago of a rich corpus of sophisticated artworks, including parietal art (that is, paintings, drawings and engravings on immobile rock surfaces) and portable art (for example, carved figurines), and the absence or scarcity of equivalent, well-dated evidence elsewhere, especially along early human migration routes in South Asia and the Far East, including Wallacea and Australia, where modern humans (Homo sapiens) were es… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
256
0
15

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(318 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
12
256
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as modern human origins in the region are concerned, archaeologists face the problem that the normally accepted 'markers' of modern humanity, such as blade tools, projectile points and use of ochre are rare to absent [in Southeast Asia] in the period of time termed 'the Upper Palaeolithic', although new dating of rock art in Sulawesi to about 40,000 years ago must surely alter our perspectives a little (Aubert et al 2014). Nevertheless, modern human behaviour in the Java Palaeolithic in Indonesia is not clearly distinguishable from the archaic human behaviour of Homo erectus in terms of the lithics that survive for archaeological inspection.…”
Section: Q10: In Your Opinion What Are Some Of the More Interesting mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as modern human origins in the region are concerned, archaeologists face the problem that the normally accepted 'markers' of modern humanity, such as blade tools, projectile points and use of ochre are rare to absent [in Southeast Asia] in the period of time termed 'the Upper Palaeolithic', although new dating of rock art in Sulawesi to about 40,000 years ago must surely alter our perspectives a little (Aubert et al 2014). Nevertheless, modern human behaviour in the Java Palaeolithic in Indonesia is not clearly distinguishable from the archaic human behaviour of Homo erectus in terms of the lithics that survive for archaeological inspection.…”
Section: Q10: In Your Opinion What Are Some Of the More Interesting mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…249-250). If we understand that the website quoted here is designed to showcase the research project of the team which in 2012 offered us a then oldest known date for hand stencils at El Castillo, Spain [13]-very recently overtaken by a finding for a hand stencil in a cave in Sulawesi, Indonesia [14]-we are able to place this description of technique firmly in the perspective of freewheeling theorizing about the caves of southern Europe, a theorizing which in its beginnings was unchecked by observations made by privileged ethnographers of the New World. Such is the force of tradition.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refinements in U/Th methods have taken place in recent years (e.g. TIMS U/ 230 Th), giving rise to MC-ICPMS (multicollector-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry) U/ 230 Th dating (Aubert et al 2014;Fontugne et al 2013;Pike et al 2012).…”
Section: Uranium-thorium Series Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%