2013
DOI: 10.1186/scrt325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleiotropic effects of cancer cells’ secreted factors on human stromal (mesenchymal) stem cells

Abstract: IntroductionStudying cancer tumors’ microenvironment may reveal a novel role in driving cancer progression and metastasis. The biological interaction between stromal (mesenchymal) stem cells (MSCs) and cancer cells remains incompletely understood. Herein, we investigated the effects of tumor cells’ secreted factors as represented by a panel of human cancer cell lines (breast (MCF7 and MDA-MB-231); prostate (PC-3); lung (NCI-H522); colon (HT-29) and head & neck (FaDu)) on the biological characteristics of MSCs.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly tumour-MSCs resulted were able to attract CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in in vitro chemotactic assays, supporting the idea that tumour-MSC are able to actively attract T lymphocytes and then suppress them in terms of cell proliferation and cytokine production. These data are consistent with a recent publication where it has been demonstrated that MSC derived from different tumours are able to attract in vitro peripheral blood mononuclear cells ( Al-toub et al , 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Interestingly tumour-MSCs resulted were able to attract CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in in vitro chemotactic assays, supporting the idea that tumour-MSC are able to actively attract T lymphocytes and then suppress them in terms of cell proliferation and cytokine production. These data are consistent with a recent publication where it has been demonstrated that MSC derived from different tumours are able to attract in vitro peripheral blood mononuclear cells ( Al-toub et al , 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The Cox proportional hazards multiple regression model was used to identify the independent prognostic factors and to correct the effect of potential confounding variables, such as gender (male vs female), age (> 65y vs < 65y), tumor stage (stage 3/4 vs stage 1/2), and of cancer type (colon adenocarcinoma vs rectal adenocarcinoma vs mucinous adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum) on OS and DFS using MedCalc 16.8.4 (MedCalc, Mariakerke, Belgium). Pathway analyses were conducted using DAVID functional annotation and clustering bioinformatics tool, as described in our previous reports [14, 15]. Statistical analyses and graphing were performed using Graphpad Prism 6.0 software (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data analyses were conducted using GeneSpring 12.0 software (Agilent Technologies) and DAVID bioinformatic tool as described before. 52 , 53 Percentile Shift was used for data normalization while Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate method was used for multiple testing corrections. The gene expression profiling in hMSCs transfected with miR-320c and the gene expression profiling during adipogenic differentiation of hMSCs data sets were deposited to the GEO, accession numbers GSE59458 and GSE59450, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%