2003
DOI: 10.1080/104868003200063478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleasure, Performance and the Big Brother Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, performance studies do not "read" an act or ask what "text" will be played. However, the emphasis is on behavior, how to interact with the audience and the people who see it, which thus cause different reactions and meanings; and how the logo changes meaning over time and in different contexts (Lavender, 2003;Thomas et al, 2021).…”
Section: Results and Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, performance studies do not "read" an act or ask what "text" will be played. However, the emphasis is on behavior, how to interact with the audience and the people who see it, which thus cause different reactions and meanings; and how the logo changes meaning over time and in different contexts (Lavender, 2003;Thomas et al, 2021).…”
Section: Results and Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hartley (Hartley 2004) examines Big Brother as a means of "taming the self " while Tincknell and Raghuram (Tincknell and Raghuram 2002) use Big Brother to examine the phenomenon of audience participation. Adrejevic (2002) looks at Big Brother as exemplifying the "surveillance society" while Lavender (2003) discusses Big Brother in terms, essentially, of the attractiveness of watching catharsis. Yesil (2001) has placed Big Brother in the historical context of what he calls "Media Voyeurism. "…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%