2018
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/yu34f
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Please sort these sounds into 2 identities”: Effects of task instructions on performance in voice sorting studies

Abstract: In the current study we investigated the effects of two types of task instructions on performance of a voice sorting task by familiar and unfamiliar listeners. In Experiment 1, listeners were asked to sort 15 naturally-varying exemplars from two voice identities into as many identities as they perceived. Results replicate the findings of previous voice and face sorting studies: unfamiliar listeners form more clusters than familiar listeners, selectively failing to “tell people together”. That is, unfamiliar li… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the familiarity rating task, participants were introduced to the experimental task. This was described as a voice sorting task, with the method mimicking the free-sort face task used by Jenkins et al (2011) and Andrews et al (2015) and used more recently with voices by Lavan, Burston, and Garrido (2018) and Lavan, Burston, et al (2019) (see also Lavan, Merriman, et al, 2019). Participants were instructed that they would be presented with a set of voice clips, which appeared as loudspeaker icons on a PowerPoint slide.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the familiarity rating task, participants were introduced to the experimental task. This was described as a voice sorting task, with the method mimicking the free-sort face task used by Jenkins et al (2011) and Andrews et al (2015) and used more recently with voices by Lavan, Burston, and Garrido (2018) and Lavan, Burston, et al (2019) (see also Lavan, Merriman, et al, 2019). Participants were instructed that they would be presented with a set of voice clips, which appeared as loudspeaker icons on a PowerPoint slide.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For unfamiliar voice processing, this means that if listeners are given a number of variable samples of unfamiliar voices, their percepts of speaker characteristics may differ for each sample, regardless of the availability of information in the acoustic signal about the ground truth of the speakers' vocal anatomy. This has been demonstrated for voices for perceived identity Lavan, Burston, Ladwa, Merriman, Knight & McGettigan, 2019;Lavan, Merriman, Ladwa, Burston, Knight & McGettigan, 2019). The face perception literature furthermore attests to the influences of variability.…”
Section: Do Person Perception Judgements Need To Have a Relationship mentioning
confidence: 78%