2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17274-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Player Valuation in European Football

Abstract: As the success of a team depends on the performance of individual players, the valuation of player performance has become an important research topic. In this paper, we compare and contrast which attributes and skills best predict the success of individual players in their positions in five European top football leagues. Further, we evaluate different machine learning algorithms regarding prediction performance. Our results highlight features distinguishing top-tier players and show that prediction performance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the statistical non-significance of the middle rank groups (4-7) reflects the complexity of the problem. There are many other factors that affect the transfer values, such as player popularity or coach preferences as well as the inflation and even the country of origin of the player [78]. Figures 3 and 6 show the impact of age on market values as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the statistical non-significance of the middle rank groups (4-7) reflects the complexity of the problem. There are many other factors that affect the transfer values, such as player popularity or coach preferences as well as the inflation and even the country of origin of the player [78]. Figures 3 and 6 show the impact of age on market values as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of massive data portraying soccer performance has facilitated recent advances in soccer analytics. The so-called soccer-logs [4,15,40,46], capturing all the events occurring during a match, are one of the most common data formats and have been used to analyze many aspects of soccer, both at team [8,11,25,35,50] and individual levels [6,12,33]. Among all the open problems in soccer analytics, the data-driven evaluation of a player's performance quality is the most challenging one, given the absence of a ground-truth for that performance evaluation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, PSV is a passbased metric that thus omits all the other kinds of events observed during a soccer match and lacks of a proper validation. Instead of proposing their own algorithm for performance quality evaluation, Nsolo et al [33] extract performance metrics from soccer-logs to predict the WhoScored.com performance rating with a machine-learning approach. The resulting model is more accurate for specific roles (e.g., forwards) and competitions (e.g., English first division) when predicting if a player is in the top 10%, 25%, or 50% of the WhoScored.com ranking.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we compare and contrast which attributes and skills best predict the success of individual ice hockey players in different positions. First, using the method in [14] we investigate which performance features were important for the three main position types in the National Hockey League (NHL) for four different seasons. For the data processing, feature selection and analysis we used R 3.6.3 and packages dplyr 0.8.3, ggplot2 3.0.0, gridExtra 2.3 and caret 6.0 as well as Weka 3.8.4 [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the data processing, feature selection and analysis we used R 3.6.3 and packages dplyr 0.8.3, ggplot2 3.0.0, gridExtra 2.3 and caret 6.0 as well as Weka 3.8.4 [6]. Our work (including [14] for football) distinguishes itself from other work on player valuation or player performance, by working with tiers of players, i.e., the top 10%, 25% and 50% players in different positions (in contrast to individual ratings). An exact ranking of players may not always be available, and for several tasks, e.g., scouting, an exact ranking of players is not necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%