2018
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2017.2758743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platoon Formation Control With Prescribed Performance Guarantees for USVs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Using the PPC methodology, adaptive tracking control with prescribed performance was proposed for a group of fully actuated marine vehicles. 19,20 In the work of Bechlioulis et al, 21 the PPC methodology was applied to solve the trajectory tracking control problem for torpedo-like and unicycle-like vehicles with prescribed performance. For a group of underactuated surface vehicles, 22 considering symmetric constraints on tracking errors of the line-of-sight ranges and angles, adaptive formation control laws were designed by employing novel barrier Lyapunov functions.…”
Section: Feedback Control With Output/state Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 Using the PPC methodology, adaptive tracking control with prescribed performance was proposed for a group of fully actuated marine vehicles. 19,20 In the work of Bechlioulis et al, 21 the PPC methodology was applied to solve the trajectory tracking control problem for torpedo-like and unicycle-like vehicles with prescribed performance. For a group of underactuated surface vehicles, 22 considering symmetric constraints on tracking errors of the line-of-sight ranges and angles, adaptive formation control laws were designed by employing novel barrier Lyapunov functions.…”
Section: Feedback Control With Output/state Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…anḋ1,̇2 3 are available for controller implementation because every term in the first time derivative of i in (22)-(24) are computable withṗ −1 i = −ṗ i ∕p 2 i , i = 1, 2, 3 and p i defined in (19). It is clear for system (27) that the designed control laws are closely related to the selection of Q according to feedback linearization technique.…”
Section: Control Design For Known Vehicle Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark Note that when the constraint requirement functions Ω bH and Ω bL are selected, such that alignleftalign-1ΩbH(t)align-2=a1+a2ea3t,a1>0,a2>0,a3>0,align-1ΩbL(t)align-2=b1+b2eb3t,b1>0,b2>0,b3>0. By ensuring the barrier function is bounded in the closed‐loop analysis, it can guarantee that the output tracking error will be always bounded by the exponentially decaying constraint functions Ω bH and Ω bL . This is one of the key ideas behind the prescribed transient performance analysis in the literature, making it a special case of our discussion on system output constraint requirements, which is more general in practice for different control objectives (constrained system output and/or prescribed system performance).…”
Section: Universal Barrier Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the tracking error can be guaranteed within a given prescribed boundary. The PPC method has been widely applied in practice such as vehicle active suspension systems [45,46], unmanned surface vehicle systems [47], nonlinear systems [48,49], fault-tolerant control [50], and robot manipulators [51]. On the other hand, the barrier Lyapunov function (BLF) is used as a constraint control which is utilized to transform the error into a new error without constraint [52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%