2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00802-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PLATO software provides analytic framework for investigating complexity beyond genome-wide association studies

Abstract: Genome-wide, imputed, sequence, and structural data are now available for exceedingly large sample sizes. The needs for data management, handling population structure and related samples, and performing associations have largely been met. However, the infrastructure to support analyses involving complexity beyond genome-wide association studies is not standardized or centralized. We provide the PLatform for the Analysis, Translation, and Organization of large-scale data (PLATO), a software tool equipped to han… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the heart of poor reproducibility are three main issues: lack of 1) standardized infrastructure (i.e., software to perform QC protocols), 2) clear documentation of QC and analysis protocols, and 3) standardization of QC protocols (Peng, 2015). SNP QC has become standardized in terms of protocols (Laurie et al, 2010;Turner et al, 2011;Zuvich et al, 2011;Verma et al, 2014; Ellingson and Fardo, 2016) and infrastructure (Purcell et al, 2007;Zheng et al, 2012;Hall et al, 2017), and it is commonplace for these to be well-documented in publications employing SNP data. Exposome QC protocol and infrastructure development, on the other hand, have previously received little attention (Engel et al, 2013;Zhu et al, 2013;Emwas et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the heart of poor reproducibility are three main issues: lack of 1) standardized infrastructure (i.e., software to perform QC protocols), 2) clear documentation of QC and analysis protocols, and 3) standardization of QC protocols (Peng, 2015). SNP QC has become standardized in terms of protocols (Laurie et al, 2010;Turner et al, 2011;Zuvich et al, 2011;Verma et al, 2014; Ellingson and Fardo, 2016) and infrastructure (Purcell et al, 2007;Zheng et al, 2012;Hall et al, 2017), and it is commonplace for these to be well-documented in publications employing SNP data. Exposome QC protocol and infrastructure development, on the other hand, have previously received little attention (Engel et al, 2013;Zhu et al, 2013;Emwas et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the backbone of EWAS is regression, a traditional and established statistical method, the series of data preprocessing steps the user takes to reach the analysis stage has not been standardized. Where GWAS shines is its standardized genomic quality control (QC) pipelines (Lemke et al, 2010;Turner et al, 2011;Ellingson and Fardo, 2016;MacArthur et al, 2017), made easily executable by a variety of popular and sophisticated platforms, such as PLINK (Purcell et al, 2007), PLATO (Hall et al, 2017;Ritchie Lab and Geisginger Health Systems, 2017), and GCTA (Yang et al, 2011). EWAS, however, falls behind GWAS in this regard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Association studies were performed using the genotype and phenotype data prepared as described above using the PLatform for the Analysis, Translation, and Organization of large-scale data (PLATO) 92,93 , a standalone program developed by the Ritchie lab for the performance of phenome-wide linear/logistic regression of genetic variants against participant phenotypes. Linear regression, assuming an additive genetic model, was performed across all 16,874 ciliary genetic variants and the 12 phenotypes listed above.…”
Section: Discovery Association Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested for single-tissue gene-trait associations by performing association tests on imputed GReX and ACTG baseline lab traits using PLATO [58,59] Colors represent different TWAS methods and y-axis is the false positive rate of tissues among statistically significant results. Single-tissue TWAS wrongly identified 5% and 77% traitirrelevant tissues for tissue-specific and broadly expressed genes, respectively.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis For Gene-level Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%