2017
DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2017.1373008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platform Structures, Homing Preferences, and Homophilous Propensities in Online Social Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, our results concur that overloaded users are novelty-affinitive [49][50][51][52] , exhibit both heterophilous and homophilous behavior [53][54][55][56] , and are more responsive within reciprocal relationships 57,58 . The factors encoding these three social theories were found to be of relatively moderate importance, after recency and low popularity of the conversation initiator, leading us to the above conclusion.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Instead, our results concur that overloaded users are novelty-affinitive [49][50][51][52] , exhibit both heterophilous and homophilous behavior [53][54][55][56] , and are more responsive within reciprocal relationships 57,58 . The factors encoding these three social theories were found to be of relatively moderate importance, after recency and low popularity of the conversation initiator, leading us to the above conclusion.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…We complement this body of work by examining preferences for active drivers and for those who have been inactive for more than six months. We also compare preferences between drivers who use more than one platform, also known as multi-homers [15,49,57], and those who use only one platform, known as single-homers. Finally, we compare preferences between drivers who have a primary job other than ride-hailing and those who work primarily for ride-hailing.…”
Section: Management Of Multi-sided Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, many banking customers own multiple credit or debit cards to optimize their payment experiences and maximize the benefits offered by card providers. Such behavior is also commonplace in the consumption of digital goods and services; users often engage with multiple social network services (SNSs) to amplify social utility (Cusumano, 2011;Kwon, Oh, & Kim, 2017). This phenomenon is known as "multi-homing" (Mantena & Saha, 2012;Rochet & Tirole, 2003).…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%