Platform Performance Investment in the Presence of Network Externalities

Abstract

Managers of emerging platforms must decide what level of platform performance to invest in at each product development cycle in markets that exhibit two-sided network externalities. High performance is a selling point for consumers, but in many cases it requires developers to make large investments to participate. Abstracting from an example drawn from the video game industry, we build a strategic model to investigate the trade-off between investing in high platform performance versus reducing investment in order to facilitate third party content development. We carry out a full analysis of three distinct settings: monopoly, price-setting duopoly, and price-taking duopoly. We provide insights on the optimum investment in platform performance and demonstrate how conventional wisdom about product development may be misleading in the presence of strong cross-network externalities. In particular, we show that, contrary to the conventional wisdom about “winner-take-all” markets, heavily investing in the core performance of a platform does not always yield a competitive edge. We characterize the conditions under which offering a platform with lower performance but greater availability of content can be a winning strategy.

Knowledge boundaries in enterprise software platform development: Antecedents and consequences for platform governance

“…Whether and how platform owners can address such ripple effects of technological decisions is unclear, because platform owners are subject to macro changes in technologies, or must constantly evaluate whether to invest in new versions of their platform (Anderson, Parker, & Tan, 2014;Katz & Shapiro, 1994). First, the finding that the technical design of a platform creates differences and dependencies in knowledge at the boundary between platform owners and complementors implies that decisions regarding platform design and governance are closely linked to each other.…”

Emergent Themes in the Interface Between Economics of Information Systems and Management of Technology

“…On the other hand, platforms like ShopRunner exhibit strong cross‐side network effects, similar to the video game consoles studied by Anderson et al. (), and these cross‐side effects benefit participating retailers. Important research in MOT is to understand how these different forces affect retail competition.…”

The Role of Industry Studies and Public Policies in Production and Operations Management

“…) as well as product development in the presence of information platforms with cross‐externalities such as videogames (Anderson et al. ). These analytical insights partially inspired related empirical work on how learning‐by‐doing influences quality performance of contract manufacturers vis‐à‐vis internal plants (Gray et al.…”

“…, Parker and Van Alstyne , Anderson et al. ). Some of these studies engendered debates about alternative operating strategies and competiveness in specific industries such as automotive, chemicals, computers, information storage, machine tools, and semiconductors (Piore and Sabel , Clark et al.…”