Platform options of free-flying satellites, UAVs or the International Space Station for remote sensing assessment of the littoral zone

Abstract

Over the years, making or creating a choice for a specific platform from which to conduct remote sensing observations of specific targets brings in many factors related to the target characteristics and how the data are going to be used. Attempts to measure Earth's diverse objects have generated a wide range of platform alternatives, from geostationary satellites to low-flying aircraft. Now several additional options possessing unique attributes are available: the International Space Station (ISS) and Un-inhabited Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). This paper explores some of the tradeoffs among these alternatives for the special problem of remotely sensing the littoral zone, but especially the shallow ecosystems. Though the surface area of the littoral zone is relatively large, it is geographically disbursed and somewhat linear. Also, the spatial, spectral and temporal variability of ecosystems in this zone is very high, and signals are masked by the overlying water column. Ideally, a frequent revisit time would be desirable to monitor their health and changing condition. These characteristics place important constraints on platform choice as one tries to design a system to monitor these critical ecosystems and provide useful information for managing them. This paper discusses these tradeoff issues as offered mainly by three platform choices: free-flying satellites, ISS, UAVs and other aircraft.

Virtual Structural Analysis of Jokisivu Open Pit Using ‘Structure-from-Motion’ Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) Photogrammetry: Implications for Structurally-Controlled Gold Deposits in Southwest Finland

“…A range of satellite images with different spectral and spatial resolutions is commonly available for geological purposes. However, in case of newly excavated open-pit mines, the satellite images may not be immediately available and may not have a record of different phases of the mine excavation mainly because of factors, like, among others, restricted the running cycle of satellites in low or high Earth orbits, atmospheric correction, and cloud cover [41]. In such cases, morphological and structural analysis of open pits are commonly performed while using a combination of terrestrial photogrammetry, light detection and ranging (LiDAR), geodetic and theodolite surveys, core logging, and measuring orientations of structural elements with a geological compass and a range of other geotechnical instruments [42].…”

Mapping coral reef environments

“…The drive for cheaper, better and faster airborne imagery has placed a large emphasis on smaller, more cost-effective sensors. Recent designs for CCD cameras provide higher spectral resolution sensors that are substantially smaller, more compact and less costly than their predecessors (Peterson et al, 2003). Recent development of IMUs (Petovello, 2004) has improved the locational positioning associated with these datasets.…”

Mine Closure Surveillance and Feasibility of UAV–AI–MR Technology: A Review Study

“…Satellites may be constrained by insufficient spatial resolution, cloud cover, the running cycle, and the height of an orbit. Piloted planes may be constrained by airspace restrictions, sun angle and weather [12]. UAV-based remote sensing systems feature both common airborne characteristics and distinctive characteristics.…”