2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platelet-to-White Blood Cell Ratio: A Prognostic Predictor for 90-Day Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke Patients with Intravenous Thrombolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
30
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proved in many previous studies that the ratio of immune cells (for example, the NE/WBC ratio, PLT/WBC) in the peripheral blood may serve as inexpensive and reproducible biomarkers. Increasing evidences indicated that peripheral blood PLT/WBC ratio may serve as a biomarker for the early diagnosis, evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy, and prognosis of many diseases . In the present study, the PLT/WBC ratio of different groups was calculated, and we observed that the PLT/WBC was significantly increased in HCA group compared with non‐HCA group ( P < 0.01); next, results of ROC analysis indicated that the AUC of PLT/WBC was 0.744, suggesting that PLT/WBC is a sensitive biomarker for the diagnosis of HCA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been proved in many previous studies that the ratio of immune cells (for example, the NE/WBC ratio, PLT/WBC) in the peripheral blood may serve as inexpensive and reproducible biomarkers. Increasing evidences indicated that peripheral blood PLT/WBC ratio may serve as a biomarker for the early diagnosis, evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy, and prognosis of many diseases . In the present study, the PLT/WBC ratio of different groups was calculated, and we observed that the PLT/WBC was significantly increased in HCA group compared with non‐HCA group ( P < 0.01); next, results of ROC analysis indicated that the AUC of PLT/WBC was 0.744, suggesting that PLT/WBC is a sensitive biomarker for the diagnosis of HCA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Some previous studies demonstrated that neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio of the patients was associated with the diagnosis and outcome of different diseases, including acute cerebrovascular diseases . On the other hand, the neutrophil‐to‐white blood cell ratio (NE/WBC) or platelet‐to‐white blood cell ratio (PLT/WBC) was significantly increased in patients with different type of diseases, for example, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and autoimmune diseases, suggesting that either NE/WBC or PLT/WBC may serve as novel biomarkers for the early diagnosis of those diseases …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, PWR might be decreased in patients with HBV infection. Previous studies also had shown that PWR was a prognostic predictor for 90-day outcomes in ischemic stroke patients with intravenous thrombolysis [ 6 ]. Moreover, our study had suggested that there was a correlation between PWR and the severity of liver disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platelet to white blood cell ratio (PLT/WBC) refers to a hematologic marker of the systemic inflammatory response. Recently, PWR has been validated not only to forecast risk of infectious complications in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for renal malignancy, but also to predict outcomes in ischemic stroke patients with intravenous thrombolysis [ 5 , 6 ]. In addition, PWR is a reliable infectious indicator that even could differentiate between infection and the normal response after splenectomy for trauma [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason may be: (1) the effect of dehydration on long‐term prognosis was determined in the present study, while the effect on short‐term prognosis in other studies; (2) thrombolysed patients with acute cerebral infarction are subjects in the present study, who are different from patients with acute cerebral infarction in other studies; (3) BUN/Cr ≥ 15 combined with USG > 1.010 was used as a marker of dehydration status in our study, while either of them as a marker in other studies; (4) mRS 0–2 was used as a good outcome in the present study, while mRS ≤ 1 was defined as a good outcome in other studies (Cappellari et al., 2013; Song et al., 2017; Tsivgoulis et al., 2016). Different mRS cut‐offs were used as good outcome in previous study, for example, mRS ≤ 1 in some studies (Cappellari et al., 2013; Song et al., 2017; Tsivgoulis et al., 2016) and mRS 0–2 in other studies (Chen et al., 2016; Neidert et al., 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%